Piano lesson (do not publish again).
(photo credit: Avi Katz)
I am impressed. You
play like a Jew, Felix. What I mean by that is that you have Johann
Sebastian Bach in your heart as well as in your fingertips.
don’t tell your mother I said this. She would be upset to hear that she
has not succeeded in bleaching Israel out of you. How mortified she
would be if, in the middle of an intellectual evening here in this very
parlor, von Humboldt were to apply his magnifying glass to you and say:
“Aha! A fine specimen of Mendelssohnius Judaeas!”
Speak up! And please do not call me Aunt Sara. Approximating family relationships is like slurring a gruppetto. I am and will always be your
Great Aunt Sara. If you wish, you may, in the grand company that
gathers so frequently in this room, be even more precise and refer to me
as “Great Aunt Sara Itzig Levy.” And you may add, if asked, “Yes, the
daughter of Daniel Itzig and Miriam Wulff, intimates of the illustrious
philosopher Moses Mendelssohn, she who studied keyboard with
Friedmann Bach, Johann Sebastian’s oldest son, and who has kept the
sweet music of the elder Bach alive in her salon through decades of
public indifference.” That will do.
And wipe that smirk off your face. There is nothing more unattractive than the smirk of a 17-year old boy.
yes, at your age you know it all. Music is universal. How can the notes
emerging from a pianoforte be Jewish, you ask? Felix, you know nothing
at all. Remember that I told you this today, in Berlin, in July 1826,
because some years from now you will realize how true it was of you when
you were young.
Listen to me. And stop cracking your knuckles.
You will ruin your joints. This piece you have played so beautifully for
me this morning, the Partita No. 5 in G Major, can only be played
properly, in our falscherleuchtung age, this time of false
enlightenment, by a person of Jewish sensibility. Please do not
interrupt me. At your age you are to listen to your elders first. After
you listen you may disagree, you may do whatever you want. But first you
Sebastian Bach was a devout Lutheran, true, but he
wrote Jewish music. I do not say this simply to embellish the repute of
my ancestral people. The nation Israel needs no trills. I say this after
long years of study and performance of Bach’s music, during which I
have come to know this remarkable man. Better, I hazard to say, than his
own sons did.
What is Jewish about the music? To see that, you
have to know music. Which, of course you do know. You also have to know
what Judaism is. Which, thanks to my niece, you do not. This is
The grandson of the great Moses Mendelssohn knows
nothing of his own people’s special relationship with God. Or I should
say, he knows what every self-satisfied Prussian burgher knows, which is
that the God of the Old Testament is harsh and vindictive and that his
erstwhile people have hopelessly lost their way in a tangle of laws and
observances in which the King of Heaven himself long ago lost interest.
you’ve had enough of tugging at those curls of yours, you might play
Movement 3, the “Courante,” once more. It’s your favorite? I am not
surprised. It’s so jumpy and exuberant that I think Bach must have been
feeling 17 when he wrote it. No, he was in his 40s. But he was as
exuberant as a young man.
Not so fast. Pay attention to what you
are doing here. In these measures. Seven through nine. Do you hear what
you have done? That hint of emphasis here, and again here? Now isn’t
You’re asking yourself, what does this crazy old
lady want of me? Oh yes, I see it in your eyes. Don’t deny it. Great
aunts know. Now you’ve got me smirking as well.
Look. How many measures in the first section? Yes, 32. And how many phrases. Four, very good. How many measures per phrase?
now. Four into 32. Eight. Eight measures per phrase? Isn’t that what
the rules would require? Bach, after all, is baroque. Baroque means very
strict rules. Everything is very regular, very predictable. That’s what
everyone says. That’s why they don’t want to listen to this music. Why
listen to something so banal when you can listen to Ludwig Beethoven put
his diarrhea into demisemiquavers? Excuse me. But you know what I mean.
If there are 32 measures and four phrases, there must be eight measures
in each phrase. So unexciting.
So where does the first phrase end? Look at the chords.
good. On this G. The first note of the ninth measure. Not the last note
of the eighth measure, but that’s close enough, don’t you think?
So your right hand should immediate pick up the melody of the second phrase after that G. Except.
what is your right hand doing at that point? Don’t you see? It started
the new melodic phrase a measure before. E-F-D-A-D-F-D, the motive
repeated here in measure ten but one note down, D-F-CG-C-E-C.
So is Bach obeying the rules or breaking them?
day you might read your grandfather’s books. If you can find them,
because I understand that your mother and father have made your house
Judenrein and that one cannot find anything prior to the Gospels on the
shelves here. But perhaps they have copies hidden away in some secret
If so, you will find that Moses our teacher received two
types of laws from our Creator. There is the written law and the oral
law. The written law is what you see in the Five Books of Moses and the
Oral Law is the supplementary material and interpretations handed down
by our Sages. In each generation the Sages are authorized – indeed
required – to understand the law in accordance with the needs of the
moment and to rule accordingly. No, this is not antinomianism. The law
is fundamental. But the law is not a single note that never changes. It
is a melodic line that flows from the tonic and returns to it inexorably
in the end.
If Bach were to have taken his 32-measure “A”
section and divided it neatly into four eight-measure phrases, he would
have been meek and law-abiding and boring. But our lives are not boring,
or at least they should not be if we truly experience God, if we love
those close to us, if we marvel at the world around us. All these things
were created and are maintained by divine and natural law, but none of
them are dull.
Nowadays, in this time when people think they are
so modern, composers simply cast off all discipline and write what is in
their hearts, they say, although I believe it often comes from their
colons. They write overtures and fantasias and serenades and meditations
but they, like your mother and father, take the easy way out. What
emerges is bland, amorphous, unworthy of music’s high calling.
first performed this Partita at Rahel Varnhagen’s salon; I believe it
was some time in the 1790s when the world was aflame. In preparing the
piece for a public concert, I initially had difficulty with the
“Courante.” Friedmann Bach had taught me to stress phrase boundaries but
here I could not see where the stress could go. I consulted with him
and he was rather dismissive: “The old man couldn’t make up his mind,”
I kept working on the piece and the morning prior to the performance I had my epiphany. Here, let me play it for you.
where is the stress? Yes, here. And here too. At the end of the melodic
line. And at the end of the harmonic progression. Which do not
You see, the underlying harmonics here are the Torah,
the Written Law. And the melody playing above it is the Oral Law. The
melody would be hollow, meaningless without the underlying harmony, and
the underlying harmony would be incomplete and useless without
the melody above it.
The simple-minded might think that the two laws should coincide. What good is a God if his message is not clear?
it is the lack of clarity, the occasional dissonance, the
unsynchronized phrases that move us forward, that propel us toward the
final resolution. And that final tonic itself sends us off into new
melodic and harmonic firmaments, from which we again return to our G
major chord. One idea begins before the previous idea has been
completed. As when you interrupt your Great Aunt Sara.
glad that excites you. Because I heard the elision of those phrases in
your fingers when you played the piece through for me. Oh, yes, I did.
That is why I said you play like a Jew. I seldom need to correct
great-nephew Felix’s technique. But I do need to help him understand why
he plays as he does.
What’s that? Why can’t you enunciate?
Sebastian Bach is what? “Cool?” Is that how you young people speak
today? Fine, let him be “cool.” Oh yes, I’ve got a whole library of
scores and parts that you can study. Just come and pay your great aunt a
Remind me to show you the “St. Matthew Passion.” It is such wonderfully Jewish music! •
Watzman is the author of ‘Company C: An American’s Life as a
Citizen-Soldier in Israel’ and ‘A Crack in the Earth: A Journey Up
Israel’s Rift Valley.’ He blogs at Southjerusalem.com