Yalla Peace: Offense is in the eye of the beheld
05/09/2012 22:21
The new IDF anti-hitchhiking campaign is stomach-turning in more ways than most Jews might think.
IDF advertisement against hitchhiking soldiers Photo: Courtesy
Sometimes I think Israelis and Palestinians spend too much time encouraging
people to be prepared for the worst, rather than focusing our energies on
concepts and ideas that might safeguard our mutual futures.
We look at
each other and instead of seeing the majority of our community that is good, we
instead see the dark side, the minority of our community that are extremists and
prone to violence.
Take the new IDF campaign to discourage soldiers from
hitchhiking, arguing in a powerful message that doing so might expose soldiers
to kidnapping by “Palestinian terror groups.” The website features a movie of a
kidnapped soldier reading his abductors’ demands to release all of the “freedom
fighters” in Israeli prisons. At the end, the soldier says: “Sorry
mother.”
The campaign was launched because information obtained through
the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) – Israel’s secret police – revealed a
Palestinian member of Islamic Jihad released to Gaza as part of the Schalit deal
had told relatives in the West Bank how to kidnap soldiers.
Hitchhiking
was high on the list, apparently.
The new IDF marketing campaign is
sloganed “Don’t catch a ride. The ride might catch you,” and will appear on
billboards at train and bus stations and on popular Internet sites, including an
IDF website.
The campaign is stomach-turning in more ways than most Jews
might think.
It targets violence by Palestinians, which is why the
kidnappers are “Palestinian Terrorists.” It’s a stereotype that plays into
“popular notions,” which is another way of saying “stereotypes.” Although the
truth is hitchhiking has always been discouraged, and not all soldiers are Jews.
Some are Druse. So why a new campaign?
Surely Palestinians even in Israel will
see the campaign as offensive. So with much sarcasm, I offer some alternative
PSA campaigns to help them see why this is so offensive.
HOW ABOUT urging
“Israelis” not to take cabs driven by Israeli Palestinians, even though many
Israeli Jews will not take “Arab cabs.” Or put up signs at restaurants that read
“Jews only.” If you keep Arabs out, they won’t blow them up. How about a
campaign to tell Israeli Jews, “We may have to live with non-Jewish Israeli
citizens, but that doesn’t mean we have to trust them.”
These are extreme
examples, but are intended to make a point from the Arab perspective, who surely
view the hitchhiking campaign as another provocation creating
animosity.
Animosity is a primary motivation for violence. Not
throwing kerosene on a fire is a good way to keep angry fires from getting
worse. But animosity is not sarcasm.
Instead of spending money on
campaigns promoting more animosity and fear-mongering, as Arabs will surely view
the IDF campaign on hitchhiking, why not invest our efforts on genuine peace,
advocating two states, one Israel and one Palestine?
Why not a campaign from the
Israeli government that reads, “Save Israel, Give up the Settlements.” It could
show a scene where a platoon of Israeli soldiers are confronting settlers
telling them that they should go home to Israel so the Palestinians can create a
state. A Palestinian could be handing a flower to the soldiers.
Maybe
another campaign might read more dramatically on billboards and buses, “A
Palestine state won’t just make the Palestinians happy. It will make Israel
safe, too.”
A third campaign might show a little Palestinian child being
led away from their home in east Jerusalem with the child saying “Israel took my
daddy’s home. But when I grow up I will fight to get it back.” Underneath could
be the slogan, “Embrace real peace. Don’t take my home.”
I have a dozen
more sarcastic ideas that might help Israeli Jews to understand why the IDF
campaign is so offensive. Maybe they’re no more offensive to Jews than the
hitchhiking campaign is to Palestinians.
This campaign would show a
picture of Yitzhak Rabin over a caption, “Don’t let his death have been in vain.
Embrace peace, again.” Instead of an Israeli soldier sitting between two
Palestinian “terrorists,” they could have a picture of Yigal Amir in handcuffs,
held by the Israeli police.
Well, they’d have to use Israelis who didn’t
agree with Amir’s violent act.
Or, better yet, what if the IDF brought
Israelis and Palestinians together to brainstorm positive PSAs to promote peace
and discourage violence? We’d probably have to have a marketing campaign to
convince the public it might work.
The writer is an award winning
Palestinian American columnist and Radio Talk Show host.