Over the past year or so, American Jewish opponents of Israel like writer and activist Peter Beinart have sought to intimidate and demoralize Israelis by telling us that American Jews either no longer support us or will stop supporting us if we don’t give in to all the Arabs’ demands.
But statistical evidence exposes these threats as utter lies. According to mountainous survey evidence, the American Jewish community writ large remains deeply supportive of Israel. Two surveys released last year by the American Jewish Committee and Brandeis University’s Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies showed that three quarters of American Jews care deeply about Israel and that Israel is an important part of their Jewish identity. The Brandeis survey notably showed that young American Jews are no less likely to support Israel than they were in the past.
In fact, American Jews under 30 are more hawkish about the Palestinian conflict with Israel than Jews between the ages of 31-40 are.
According to the Brandeis survey, 51 percent of American Jews oppose a future division of Jerusalem, while a mere 29% would support it.
Younger Jews are more opposed to the capital’s partition than older Jews are.
It is notable that the Brandeis survey found that political views do not impact American Jews’ support for Israel. This is striking because among Americans at large, polls show Republicans are significantly stronger supporters of Israel than Democrats. But not among Jews.
“Liberals felt no less connected than conservatives and were no less likely to regard Israel as important to their Jewish identities. These observations hold true for both younger and older respondents,” the Brandeis survey report explained.
Across the board, American Jews blame the Palestinians for the absence of peace and believe there is little chance that there will be peace between Israel and the Palestinians in the foreseeable future. Seventy-five percent agreed with the statement, “The goal of the Arabs is not the return of occupied territories but rather the destruction of Israel”; 94% said the Palestinians should be required to accept the Jewish state’s right to exist.
In light of these overwhelming levels of support, it is disconcerting to see that across the US, Jewish communities are failing to prevent anti- Zionist Jews from hijacking communal funds and facilities to finance anti-Israel activities.
CONSIDER A few recent examples.
In Orange County, California, intra-communal rancor is growing over the
local Jewish Federation’s financial and organizational support for
University of California at Irvine’s Olive Tree Initiative.
The Federation subsidizes Olive Tree Initiativeorganized tours of Israel
for Jewish students. As Tammi Benjamin from UC Santa Cruz explained in a
letter last December to local Federation CEO Shalom Elcott and local
Hillel director Jordan Fruchtman, while OTI claims to be interested in
fostering good relations between Jewish and Arab students, it actually
just propagandizes against Israel. The speakers who addressed students
participating in the two-week trip were overwhelmingly anti-Israel.
Almost all the Palestinian speakers expressed hatred for Israel. Many of
the Israeli speakers represented groups that call for economic warfare
against Israel and defame Israel as a racist state. Half of the
supposedly neutral representatives of international organizations who
spoke to the group are notorious for their opposition to Israel.
Rather than end the practice of using Jewish communal funds to
propagandize Jewish students to hate the Jewish state that most American
Jews support and see as important to their Jewish identity, the
Federation and Hillel have dug in their heels.
This week, the Los Angeles Jewish Journal reported that over the past
two months, allegedly acting on instructions from the Federation, two
local synagogues canceled an event sponsored by the local branch of the
Zionist Organization of America at which Irvine Rabbi Dov Fischer was to
present information about OTI’s anti-Israel activities.
Speaking to the paper, Fischer said, “The amazing thing is how there has
been a clamp-down by The Federation to prevent any speech or dissent in
the community against The Federation’s program. The idea that two
different temples in the community, who have all kinds of speakers,
canceled this program is profoundly shocking.”
Meanwhile on the East Coast, both the Washington and New York Jewish
communities are embroiled in a feud over Federation funding for
anti-Israel Jewish groups. In Washington, a group of pro-Israel
activists operating as the Committee Opposed to Propaganda Masquerading
as Art has begun a campaign to end Federation funding for anti-Israel
In a letter to Federation President Susie Gelman and Federation board
members from March 6, COPMA’s chairman Robert Samet argued, “It is
critical that the Federation establish guidelines for withholding
funding from partner agencies that engage in political propaganda and
activism denigrating Israel and undermining its legitimacy as a strong,
secure and independent Jewish state.”
COPMA’s specific concern is Federation Funding for the District of
Columbia Jewish Community Center’s professional theater group Theater J.
As the letter explained, “Theater J, a partner agency of the Federation
and a recipient of its funding and support, has turned an arts program
at the DCJCC... into a platform for political activism that expresses
hostility and antipathy towards the State of Israel and little regard
for its security.”
In 2009, Theater J staged the virulently anti- Semitic post-modern
passion play Seven Jewish Children by Caryl Churchill. The play accuses
the entire Jewish population of Israel of mass murders that were never
Unfortunately, as COPMA notes, this is par for the course. In the past,
Theater J’s artistic director Ari Roth organized buses to bring
community members to Shepherdstown, West Virginia, to watch a production
of the virulently anti-Israel propaganda play My Name is Rachel Corrie.
This year, under Roth’s leadership, Theater J presented Return to Haifa,
a play that COPMA argues “distorts the history and origins of Israel
and makes the historically accurate death of a Jewish child in the
Holocaust… comparable to the fabricated and utterly fantastical story of
an Arab child allegedly abandoned by his fleeing parents in Haifa in
1948, ostensibly as a result of their terror over advancing Israelis.”
In response to COPMA’s letter, Roth told the Forward that it “is not a
prerogative of the donor” to intervene in artistic content, and claimed
that attempts to limit the theater’s activities amounted to censorship
Carol Greenwald, COPMA’s treasurer, rejects Roth’s arguments. In her
words, “The issue is not artistic freedom to create whatever the artist
chooses; the issue is the appropriateness of a Jewish communal
institution using Jewish communal funding to showcase defamation of the
The Forward quoted Andrew Apostolou, a local Jewish Community Relations
Council member, as quite sensibly saying, “There are things a Jewish
community shouldn’t be doing, like serving a bacon cheeseburger on Yom
Kippur. Putting on an anti-Semitic play is one of these things.”
COPMA is not alone in its concerns. In New York, a group of activists
formed a new organization called JCC Watch to force the New York Jewish
Federation to end financial support to the Manhattan JCC due to its
partnership with organizations that support economic warfare against
Israel through calls for economic boycotts, divestment and sanctions.
Like COPMA, JCC Watch asks that the local Federation adopt guidelines to
prevent Federation funds from being transferred to groups and
programming that showcase calls for economic and political warfare
So far, Washington’s Federation has not responded to COPMA’s letter.
Interviewed by the Forward, the Washington Federation’s CEO defended
giving supporters of anti-Israel sanctions the stage as part of
Federation-sponsored panels on the grounds of “welcoming multiple
voices.” And in an op-ed in New York Jewish Week last month, the New
York Federation’s CEO defended the JCC’s partnership with groups that
engage in economic and political warfare against Israel.
WHAT IS going on here? According to the AJC and Brandeis surveys, fewer
than 10% of American Jews tend to accept the Arab line against Israel.
Given the wall-to-wall support for Israel among American Jews, why do
American Jewish organizational leaders refuse to do what their members
want them to do? Why are they taking Jewish communal funds to finance
activities and causes that are offensive to the Jewish community? Why
are they pretending that the call to end communal funding for
anti-Israel activities is a call for an abrogation of free speech? To
get a sense of how unprecedented this is, it is useful to consider the
American Jewish community’s response to Jews for Jesus. While Reform and
Orthodox rabbis agree on almost nothing relating to Jewish laws and
practices, since the emergence of Jews for Jesus in the 1970s, Reform,
Conservative and Orthodox rabbis have been unified in their rejection of
the Christian missionary group’s protestations of being Jewish.
Everyone understands that while Jews have a perfect right to change
their religion, they have no right to force the Jewish community to
accept Christians as Jews. That is, they have no right to change the
definition of Judaism to include people who worship Jesus.
So-called Messianic Jews falsely call themselves Jews to undermine the
community from within. But no Federation feels compelled to invite a
representative of so-called Messianic Jews to proselytize on stage as
part of a panel discussion in order to “welcome multiple voices.”
Hillel organizations have rightly refused space and funding to Messianic Jewish groups.
But today, American Jews find themselves helpless when a marginal group
of anti-Zionist Jews demands – like the Messianic Jews of their day –
communal funding and space for their anti-Israel activities.
The anti-Zionist groups make the same arguments as the Messianic Jews.
They call themselves pro-Israel even as they engage in activities aimed
at harming, defaming, weakening and delegitimizing the Jewish state.
They claim that refusing them communal funds constitutes a violation of
their free speech rights.
Yet while communal leaders did not hesitate to call the so-called
Messianic Jews’ bluff, they cannot find the way to expunge anti-Israel
groups from their umbrella organizations.
The explanation for this behavior is apparently social. Federation
leaders don’t mind disappointing evangelical Christians. But most of
their friends are leftist. Consequently the perceived social cost of
taking action against groups like Theater J, J Street, B’Tselem,
Breaking the Silence and Jewish Voices for Peace is too high for many
American Jewish leaders to bear.
Happily, a handful of committed community members throughout the country
are standing up and demanding that their communal leaders act in the
interests of the communities they serve. It can only be hoped that the
overwhelming majority of American Jews who clearly wish to support
Israel will join these activists’ call and demand that all Jewish
Federations stop allowing anti-Israel groups to feed from the communal
trough. If they do, they will find that much to their surprise, the
social costs of actions will be far smaller than they expected.
After all, Israel’s supporters are the email@example.com