Jerusalem Post's talented team of journalists provides insight into their work presented in the opinion section. This section highlights the beliefs and values that experienced writers who are witnessing the Middle East turmoil unfold. Their first hand encounters with world leaders have shaped their opinions and world views to be shared on this page.
The measures taken by university administrators, including the suspension of protesters, seem to fan the flames further.
In their book Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction, Philip Tetlock and Dan Gardner argue that good decision-makers need to be good predictors of outcomes of their decision-making.
Since October 7, and especially in recent weeks, more and more American patriots, let alone Jews, are approaching this exciting leap forward apprehensively.
Readers of The Jerusalem Post have their say.
Why, and how, did this trend of indifference, outright ignorance, or assigning the topics a lower grade of interest take root?
In combating this vile behavior, many, including professors, have pointed out the double standard applied to these protests.
As in the Middle Ages, certain Jews still crave a certain kind of “acceptance” – in this case the acceptance that only being part of the intersectional movement can provide.
It’s a terrifying thought that the product of the most vaunted and expensive universities in the world is hatred and staggering ignorance.
Today, I will tackle the Times’s opinion writer, Thomas Friedman, and his recent column, “Israel has a choice to make: Rafah or Riyadh,” for factual context and even-handedness.
In reality, the students are extremists who endanger every sane person who seeks a well-rounded society.