Buttigieg: There’s nothing to gain by moving US Embassy back to Tel Aviv

The same is true, he said, with regard to the Trump administration’s recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan, the Democratic presidential candidate added.

June 18, 2019 05:05
1 minute read.
Pete Buttigieg

US Democratic candidate Mayor Pete Buttigieg. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg said he would not move the U.S. Embassy back to Tel Aviv from Jerusalem.

“I think what’s done is done,” Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, said Sunday in an interview with “Axios on HBO.”

He went on to say:  Look, we need a big-picture strategy on the Middle East. I don’t know that we’d gain much by moving it to Tel Aviv.”

Pressed on whether Buttigieg did the right thing in making the move, Buttigieg suggested that Trump should have offered it as a reward for Israeli movement on the peace process.

“[I]f you’re going to give somebody something that they’ve wanted for a long time in the context of a push-pull, even with a strong ally like Israel … you don’t do that without getting some kind of concession. Instead, we’ve seen the Israeli government continue to act in ways that are detrimental to peace. And I believe, therefore, also detrimental to U.S. interests.”

The same is true, he said, with regard to the Trump administration’s recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan.

“The Israeli claims in the Golan are not something to be ignored, they have a lot to do with legitimate security interests,” Buttigieg said. But U.S. recognition, he said, “was given away” and “worse probably for the specific purpose to have an impact in Israeli domestic politics, which should be the last reason that we would be conducting American foreign policy.”

Asked about the Palestinian “right of return” for refugees issue, Buttigieg was short on specifics, saying “I think that concept can be honored in the context of a negotiated peace.”

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

July 17, 2019
House votes to condemn Trump's Twitter thread as racist and hate-mongering


Cookie Settings