Elena Kagan: Imagine if a travel ban targeted Israelis

What if “a vehement antisemite (who) says all kinds of denigrating comments about Jews” during his campaign is elected president and then issues a travel ban on Israelis?

April 26, 2018 12:52
1 minute read.
Elana Kagan

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan attends a ceremonial swearing in ceremony for Defense Secretary Ash Carter at the Pentagon in Washington, U.S, on March 6, 2015.. (photo credit: YURI GRIPAS/REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


WASHINGTON — Justice Elana Kagan asked the lawyer defending the president’s travel ban to imagine the same ban if it applied to Israelis.

In her hypothetical challenge during oral arguments on President Donald Trump’s ban on travel from several Muslim majority countries, Kagan asked if a similar ban on Israelis by an antisemitic president would be constitutional.

What if “a vehement antisemite (who) says all kinds of denigrating comments about Jews” during his campaign is elected president and then issues a travel ban on Israelis, Kagan, who is Jewish, asked Noel Francisco, the solicitor general who was defending the ban, in hearings Wednesday.

Francisco said it could be legal. “If his Cabinet were to actually come to him and say, ‘Mr. President, there is honestly a national security risk here and you have to act,’ I think then that the president would be allowed to follow that advice even if in his private heart of hearts he also harbored animus,” he said.

Opponents of the ban say it is discriminatory because of comments Trump made as a candidate and then as president indicating he was targeting the countries because of what he perceived as a broader Muslim threat.

The Trump administration contends that the ban is too narrow to be considered discriminatory. There have been several iterations of the ban; currently, Muslim majority countries on the list include Syria, Libya, Iran, Yemen and Somalia.

A number of Jewish groups, including HIAS, the lead immigration advocacy group in the Jewish community, the Anti-Defamation League and the National Council of Jewish Women, have joined briefs challenging the ban.

The Zionist Organization of America has filed an amicus brief in support of the ban.

Kagan elicited laughter when she described her hypothetical. “This is an out-of-the-box kind of president in my hypothetical,” she said.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Mayor Pete Buttigieg
May 26, 2019
Pete Buttigieg knocks Trump decisions on Jerusalem, Golan