State calls on court to reject Benizri's request to shorten sentence

By DAN IZENBERG
July 21, 2009 17:57

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For a symbolic $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Don't show it again

The state on Tuesday asked the Supreme Court to reject former Labor and Welfare Minister Shlomo Benizri's request to reconsider a four-year jail sentenced handed down in an earlier decision. Recently, the Supreme Court decided to increase the punishment originally handed down by Tel Aviv District Court from 18 months to four years in jail. In his request for a second hearing, Benizri argued that the court had established a new legal principle by sentencing him to such a long sentence. Benizri was convicted of fraud and breach of faith because he accepted benefits from a foreign manpower contractor, Moshe Sela, and used his power as a minister to do favors for Sela in return. According to the state, the punishment handed down by the Supreme Court was proportional. Furthermore, according to the law, no one may appeal a decision made by the Supreme Court unless it creates a new legal principle. No new principle was established in the Benizri ruling, according to attorney Michael Karshen of the State Attorney's office.


Related Content

Breaking news
June 25, 2018
Four Germans arrested, one released, during elections in Turkey

By REUTERS