Supreme Court rejects appeal of Gaza arms smuggler who claims Shin Bet obtained coerced confession

By
February 15, 2015 21:37

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Supreme Court on Sunday voted 2-1 to reject the appeal of a Gaza man who sought to overturn his conviction for massive arms smuggling through Hamas tunnels and other offenses, arguing that his confession should be ignored as it was allegedly obtained improperly either by abuse or when he was physically unhealthy.

The majority vote on the appeal of Faouzi Ramilat was carried by Supreme Court President Miriam Naor and Justice Noam Sohlberg against a dissenting vote by Justice Yoram Danziger.

Ramilat was convicted of involvement in illegally smuggling hundreds of Kalashnikov rifles, handguns, explosives and persons around and across the Gaza, Sinai and Israel borders during the years 2004-2009. Including six major arms transactions.

He was sentenced to nine years in prison as a key player, though not the central one, in the smuggling.

All three justices threw out completely a variety of Ramilat’s claims of being abused, while expressing concern with aspects of his health and state during the interrogation.

Related Content

Breaking news
July 23, 2018
U.S. judge lets 5 Manafort trial witnesses to testify in place of immunity

By REUTERS