Consumer group probes roaming charges at Partner, Cellcom

The ICC said it is investigating Partner Comm. and Cellcom in response to complaints from cellphone users who claim the companies are "unfairly" billing roaming fees.

By MATTHEW KRIEGER
May 21, 2007 07:41
2 minute read.
cellphone feat biz 88

cellphone feat biz 88. (photo credit: )

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Israeli Consumer Council said Sunday it is investigating Partner Communications and Cellcom in response to numerous complaints from frustrated cellphone users who claim the companies are "unfairly" billing roaming fees. Ehud Peleg, director-general of the ICC, is demanding that the cellular service providers cease the practice of charging roaming fees for calls made near the country's borders without properly informing customers that these fees will be charged and that they switch to a system that doesn't automatically bill these roaming charges anytime a call is made near the country's borders with Jordan, Syria and Lebanon. "Customers were automatically billed much higher rates - without prior knowledge - and we are calling on these companies to return the stolen money to the customers," said Peleg, who did not specify how much had been "stolen." Partner and Cellcom employ GSM technology in their phones, which is the Global System for Mobile communications used by over 2 billion people across more than 212 countries and territories. The popularity of the GSM standard makes international roaming very common between mobile phone operators, enabling subscribers to use their phones in many parts of the world. However, the technology automatically switches the cellphone into the best service area as the user moves from place to place something that often can lead to roaming charges when the customer leaves the country. Israeli cellphone users, even without leaving the country and without knowledge of this practice, have also been assessed these fees when venturing into areas that are near the service areas of other countries, such as in Eilat, the Dead Sea, the Jordan Valley and the Golan Heights, the council charged. The "out-of-country" roaming fees that are charged can reach up to NIS 10 per minute above the average call made within Israel's borders, a very significant and damaging charge, noted Peleg. "There is no reason for this additional charge and there should be no difference in price because these calls are also made from within the country," he said. The fact that Partner and Cellcom have not broadcast these charges when signing-up customers is illegal, added Peleg. Responding to the council's charges, the communication companies said they are rectifying the situation by altering phone settings so they do not automatically switch to foreign servers, however, if a customer placed a call before the settings were changed, a roaming fee will be assessed. Partner claimed that anytime one of their customers enters into a "roaming zone," an SMS text message is sent notifying the customer of the change in service area. In order to prevent and refute these charges in the future, the consumer council suggested carefully checking monthly phone bills and immediately contacting the company and demanding a refund if any charges appear that indicate that a customer made phone calls from outside of the country despite not leaving.

Related Content

The Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
April 30, 2015
Teva doubles down on Mylan, despite rejection

By GLOBES, NIV ELIS