B’Tselem accuses IDF of excessive force in West Bank

Complaint follows 13 Palestinian deaths, but IDF says it stuck to the rules of engagement.

By
July 31, 2014 22:06
2 minute read.
Riot

The riots centered on Kalandiya, with smaller clashes in Isawiya.. (photo credit: SETH J. FRANTZMAN)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

B’Tselem on Wednesday night accused the IDF of excessive force in a series of recent West Bank incidents that led to the deaths of 13 Palestinians.

The Jerusalem Post has learned that the IDF did not formally loosen its rules of engagement for the West Bank during the period in question.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The 13 were killed between July 14 and July 29, with 12 of the 13 killed between July 21 and July 29.

Admitting that in some cases Palestinians used live fire or Molotov cocktails against the IDF, the human rights group said that the IDF was still overusing live fire – as opposed to standard crowd-control measures.

In addition, B’Tselem’s initial information indicated that since Protective Edge Operation began, at least 577 Palestinians were wounded by the IDF – 388 of which were hit by live fire – which it said were enormous numbers.

Next, the NGO said the IDF used excessive force to disperse demonstrations and clashes, “in circumstances that posed no mortal danger.”

It said that “eyewitness reports of sniper fire are compatible with the figures indicating that most wounds from live ammunition were to the lower torso and limbs,” noting that though this indicates “an effort to avoid lethal injury, the very use of live fire, precise as it may be, greatly enhances the risk of loss of life and cannot be justified if the lives of security forces are not at risk.”



Most importantly, B’Tselem accused the IDF of disregarding its own rules for avoiding live fire in the West Bank.

The Post learned that the IDF’s rules of engagement in the West Bank are highly specific and provide tailored responses to different levels of crowd disturbances or violence.

The IDF said that since the beginning of operations Bring Our Boys Home and Protective Edge there has been an uptick of violent outbursts against security forces in the Judea and Samaria region – during which live fire against security forceswas used – and that investigations will ensue within the proper army guidelines.

Furthermore the IDF regards the level of violence during the period of time in question as unusually high.

IDF statistics show that there have been 14 Palestinian deaths.

According to Military Advocate General policy, an investigation is to be opened in each case of civilian death as a result of military operations, unless it was caused during a serious violent altercation.

As such, Military Police has opened an investigation into 11 of the civilian deaths. The other three will be looked into by the proper IDF authorities.

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
August 31, 2014
Prime minister to Channel 1: I’ll be running again in next election

By Gil Stern Stern HOFFMAN