Prime minister or mayor of Jerusalem?

Olmert’s legal team decided that he could get a lighter sentence by emphasizing that during the Holyland events he was “just” mayor of Jerusalem and not yet prime minister.

By
April 30, 2014 03:49
1 minute read.
Ehud Olmert speaking at the Hebrew University, January 6, 2014.

Ehud Olmert speaking at the Hebrew University, January 6, 2014.. (photo credit: Sason Tiram)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Former prime minister Ehud Olmert’s legal team may have made an extraordinarily clever last-minute tactical maneuver deciding to emphasize his “mayorness” instead of his “prime ministerness” in his sentencing hearing for bribery in the Holyland trial.

It had been widely expected that former Mossad head Meir Dagan would testify on his behalf as a character witness, describing his contributions to enhancing the country’s national security.

Maybe the most powerful character witness one could imagine.

Until they canceled him Monday at the last second, which only became known when he did not show up in court.

Why did they drop him? It finally became clear on Tuesday, that Olmert’s legal team decided that he could get a lighter sentence by emphasizing that during the Holyland events he was “just” mayor of Jerusalem and not yet prime minister.

In some of the counterintuitive logic that prevails in some legal opinions, higher officials like ministers don’t get less prison time for their contributions to the state, but more prison time since they must serve as an example.

His lawyer Eli Zohar identified a line of lesser sentences for mayors as opposed to for past ministers and told the court that, if Olmert received any prison sentence, it must be similar to the mayors.


This outweighed whatever speculative general benefit Dagan could have provided.

But Olmert himself did not stick to this strategy.

In deciding to dramatically retake the witness stand and thunder away at the court for five-straight minutes about how wrong its conviction of him was – he took privileges that only a prime minister could take.

Most of the other prominent defendants, including former Jerusalem mayor Uri Lupolianski, said little or kept it low key.

Whether the tactical focus on Olmert as mayor will pay off, or whether his powerful and nearly unprecedented denouncement of the court will evaporate any vision other than of Olmert the prime minister, remains to be seen and could be key in determining his punishment.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
August 31, 2014
Prime minister to Channel 1: I’ll be running again in next election

By Gil Stern Stern HOFFMAN