Upgrading Israeli nuclear deterrence; Core consequences of P5+1 agreement with Iran

Current instabilities in the Middle East will generate compelling reasons for Israel to re-examine its traditional posture of nuclear ambiguity.

April 12, 2015 15:12
Iran nuclear talks

Officials wait for a meeting with officials from P5+1, the European Union and Iran at the Beau Rivage Palace Hotel in Lausanne March 31, 2015.. (photo credit: REUTERS)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

As a result of the P5+1 agreement with Iran, badly brokered by the president of the United States, Israel could be forced to substantially upgrade its nuclear deterrence posture. Simultaneously, if the pact actually enters into force, Jerusalem will have to fend off increasing calls for Israel to join the 1968 Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT) -  calls from varied national sources, stemming from predictably propagandistic claims that now "even Iran has renounced a nuclear weapons option."      
In law, war and genocide are not mutually exclusive. On several occasions, Iran's supreme leaders have called openly for Israel's eradication. Israel, in response, is entitled to do whatever is needed to survive, including pertinent refinements to its policies on preemption, deterrence, and active defense. One key element of these needed refinements will have to involve the country's security posture of "deliberate nuclear ambiguity."

Till today, this posture has seemingly made sense.  Both friends and enemies of the Jewish State already recognize that Israel possesses military nuclear capabilities that are  (1) survivable; and (2) capable of penetrating all enemy air defense and ballistic missile defense systems.


Related Content