Media Matters: Is the IBA worth saving?

Instead of trying to compete with private broadcasters, the IBA needs to do exactly what it is meant to do – broadcast for the public.

By STEFANIE GARDEN
February 26, 2010 16:36
3 minute read.
The IBA building in Jerusalem (Ariel Jerozolimski)

IBA 311. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Does anybody watch public broadcasting anymore? In the age of high-definition television and digital recording, the often less than stellar, even archaic, quality of public television broadcasts just does not seem to fit. Israel’s Broadcasting Authority has been learning this the hard way, and after years of struggling with tanking viewership and a lack of leadership, it seems to have reached a do-or-die situation.

The Israel Broadcasting Authority operates four television channels, with broadcasts in Hebrew, Arabic and English, as well as several radio stations which broadcast internationally in 14 languages. As the government of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu continues to emphasize that public diplomacy and good hasbara are the nation’s top priority, the value of the Israel Broadcasting Authority should seem obvious.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


This is unfortunately not the case.

The IBA has for decades has been managed by political appointees with little or no professional media experience. I’m no Ted Turner, but I can say quite confidently that handing over four television stations and eight radio stations should be done with very careful consideration and should not be given to someone with less than extensive media and business expertise.

The evidence is in the programming. Technologically speaking, watching some of these broadcasts is like watching those cheaply made commercials for a local family-owned furniture store that only come on after 10 p.m. The graphics are cheesy, the video quality is grainy, the sound is off, and even the people don’t look like they belong in this decade. It looks and feels unprofessional, and it is simply unpleasant to watch.

Public broadcasting tends to be that way. Without the revenue from advertising, public television will never match the glitz and glam of ad-based programming.

SO WHO is currently in charge of the IBA, and why can’t we just get rid of them and find someone new? As it turns out, the Israel Broadcasting Authority has not had a proper director for television, television content or television news in over eight months. Instead, a number of “acting directors” have attempted, and clearly failed, to manage the IBA. Furthermore, Yuli Edelstein – the minister who up until a few days ago was responsible for overseeing the IBA – had refused to forward a proposed an amendment to the IBA Law, which would have taken control over appointments of the director general and the chairman of the board out of the government’s hands.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


So can the IBA be saved? More importantly, is it even worth saving? The answer is yes. It absolutely is worth saving. Public broadcasting, in any country, is one of the greatest vehicles for preserving local culture. Sure, Israel’s satellite and cable television providers, Yes and Hot, offer some original Israeli programming, but global entertainment media is dominated by the United States and Europe, and the handful of Israeli programs which exist have – for the most part – modeled themselves after Hollywood-style production.

Public television is more than a novelty, it’s one of the truest expressions of history and culture, and it can explore issues in a more in-depth and complex manner than commercial media can.

However, in Israel, the IBA has failed to demonstrate that ability, and that’s where it needs to refocus its attention. Instead of trying to get up to speed and compete with private broadcasters, the IBA needs to do exactly what it is meant to do – broadcast for the public.

Israelis pay for the IBA, whether they watch it or not. A full 85% of the IBA’s budget is based on a licensing fee paid by the public anytime they purchase a television or radio. Without even realizing it, Israelis are essentially stock-holders of the IBA, only they aren’t given the supervision or representative control a stock-holder in a company is entitled to. It is therefore up to the public to demand reform within the IBA.

Much of what the IBA has to offer is irreplaceable. For Americans living in Israel, specifically, it is difficult to imagine the disappearance of its English-language news service. The tragedy of the IBA is that for all its potential it has been held back by incompetent management, political intervention, and an overall poor organizational structure. Public broadcasting is useless unless it provides the public with something truly different and valuable – something they can’t get from commercial media.

With no current management and no leadership, the responsibility for the Israel Broadcast Authority’s magnificent rebound or tragic demise now lies in the hands of Netanyahu. It is up to him to break the pattern of appointing incompetent leadership and let the IBA evolve to better suit the public’s interests and expectations.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Supreme Court President Asher Grunis
August 28, 2014
Grapevine: September significance

By GREER FAY CASHMAN