Analysis: W. Bank disturbances not intifada, yet

Security sources say term "third intifada" to describe upsurge in clashes is misused, but IDF must avoid Palestinian casualties.

By
February 24, 2013 22:18
1 minute read.
A Palestinian throws a stone at IDF soldiers during clashes at Hawara, February 20, 2013

Palestinian protest flame HawaraCheckpoint 370. (photo credit: Abed Omar Qusini)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

If one asks security sources familiar with the West Bank, the term “third intifada” has been misused in the media to describe the upsurge in disturbances in recent days.

As one senior source noted, when the second intifada erupted in 2000, mobs consisting of thousands of Palestinians clashed with the IDF.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


As the army lost control of the situation, mass rioting was accompanied by deadly Palestinian terrorist attacks within Israel.

In contrast, on Sunday between 100 and 200 Palestinians threw rocks at soldiers in a few locations, including greater Hebron and Beitunya.

The IDF succeeded in quickly dispersing most of the rioters. A hard core of around 30 remained to continue the clashes before being dispersed. That does not constitute an intifada in the army’s eyes.

Nevertheless, the danger remains that the increase in violence could escalate further.

To minimize the chances of that happening, security forces have been instructed to employ restraint whenever possible as they contain the violence.


Soldiers must prevent rioters from reaching roads or, in Hebron, from reaching Jewish neighborhoods. But they must also try, as hard as they can, to avoid casualties on the other side. Those are the orders the soldiers have received from their superiors.

Violent disorder sparked by the issue of Palestinian prisoners is not a new phenomenon.

A year ago, riots erupted following a hunger strike launched by then-prisoner Khader Adnan. Six months ago, the pattern repeated itself over the same issue.

Hence, the IDF isn’t in any rush to define recent developments in the West Bank as a third intifada.

Rather, according to security evaluations, the violence will peak, and then gradually decrease.

Yet, events can, occasionally, spiral out of control and the IDF is preparing for the possibility that reality does not keep in step with security evaluations.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Supreme Court President Asher Grunis
August 28, 2014
Grapevine: September significance

By GREER FAY CASHMAN