(photo credit: Courtesy)
American-Israeli Anna Wexler was thrilled about the opportunity to join a panel
of scientists at the World Conference of Science Journalists 2011 in Doha,
Qatar, held June 27-29. As the date approached, excitement turned to trepidation
as she found herself the unexpected target of an academic boycott after learning
that the presence of an Israeli participant was drawing protest from Arab
scientists on the panel.
'Hamas leadership intends to flee Damascus for Qatar'
UAE and Qatar pack an Arab punch in Libya operation
The 26-year-old neuroscientist, who made aliya
in 2008 and currently lives in Tel Aviv, said she was invited to speak on a
panel titled “Can You Hear Me Now? Writing for a Non- English Audience,” which
dealt with science reporting performed by researchers in countries where English
is not the local language.
Wexler – who holds two undergraduate degrees
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), one in brain and cognitive
science, the other dealing with both the humanities and the sciences that focus
on writing – works with Israeli scientists who conduct their research in Hebrew,
which she then writes about in English.
With the conference a little more
than a month away, Wexler said she received an email from its co-organizer,
American scientist and journalist Deborah Blum, in which “she told me there were
protests against my appearance from the Arab Science Journalists Association. So
she removed me from the panel that I was supposed to speak on while they tried
to figure out what to do from there.”
The panel included an Egyptian
moderator and participants from Pakistan and Egypt.
Wexler said she was
in the dark about how the protest was playing out or who was leading
JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:
“It was presented to me that by appearing on a panel with someone from Israel, the other peoples’ careers could be ruined for being seen
as normalizing relations with Israel.”
At this point, Wexler said she
began to take stock of her options, and was “going back and forth about whether
or not to publicly withdraw from the conference. I started putting together a
press release because I figured I’d withdraw, but not go
Eventually, Wexler said a compromise was reached and organizers
placed her on a panel discussing science filmmaking, alongside two panelists and
a moderator from the United States. Wexler said that while she has made some
films, she is more a science writer than filmmaker.
Wexler said that
organizers, including Blum, were highly distressed by the controversy and stuck
up for her, and also feared that if she were to be banned from taking part
because of her nationality, it would set a bad precedent for future conferences.
She also said she was told by organizers that some participants did not
personally object to appearing with an Israeli, but worried that they would be
punished professionally back home.
Wexler, who grew up in New York and
New Jersey, described the irony of being considered “the Israeli” in that she
has never presented herself as an Israeli in her professional work and is
typically considered an American by her colleagues in Israel.
kind of weird because I’ve never represented Israel in a professional setting
and you’re kind of used to representing yourself as an American here. This is
the first time I’ve been publicly identified as an Israeli.”
novelty of becoming an accidental symbol of Israel, finding herself unexpectedly
thrust into the role of the blacklisted Israeli was both disappointing and an
opportunity lost, according to Wexler.
“I was just disappointed. I was so
excited that this panel would overcome politics – speaking on a panel with an
Egyptian and a Pakistani – and I thought it would transcend politics and we’d
talk about science and our careers, so I think I was just mostly disappointed
that it wouldn’t happen.”
Wexler said she still had a great time at the
conference, which provided what she said were “insane opportunities for
networking” with the more than 700 attendees from all branches of the science
In addition, she said that when word got out at the conference
about the controversy surrounding her participation, she was approached time and
again by sympathetic attendees who expressed their dismay.
the only invitee to face problems unrelated to science. Palestinian journalism
professor Farid Abu Dheir of An-Najah National University in Nablus was
prevented from leaving the West Bank to attend the conference. Abu Dheir told
the magazine Science Insider that Israeli authorities accused him of having ties
to Hamas and would not allow him to leave to attend the
Thrust into the debate over academic boycotts, Wexler said
the event forced her to solidify her stance on the boycott issue.
made me clarify my position on the academic boycott. In a sense, I do
understand where the Arabs are coming from. Today, the people who support the
academic boycott of Israel often bring up the academic boycott of South Africa
in the 1990s, which they say was critical to ending apartheid, as their model. I
don’t know how effective the academic boycott specifically was in ending
apartheid – I think that’s up for debate – but it’s clear that a boycott can be
a useful tool. I don’t agree with the occupation, so I understand and support
the use of nonviolent tools to end it. Boycotting, say, products produced in the
territories is one thing, but boycotting all academics, regardless of their
personal beliefs, is another. The recent events surrounding my appearance made
me realize that the academic boycott is something I do not support.”
Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>