IMA objects to force-feeding of hunger-strikers

IMA chairman Dr. Leon Eidelman says that such a law would “violate the rules of international ethics.”

July 15, 2013 02:03
1 minute read.
Samer Essawi after being sentenced, February 21, 2013.

Samer Isssawi, hunger-striker 370. (photo credit: Marc Israel Sellem/ The Jerusalem Post)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

After hearing that the Justice Ministry is preparing a bill that would allow, with a court’s permission, the forced-feeding of security prisoners that are refusing to eat, the Israel Medical Association voiced its strong opposition on Sunday.

IMA chairman Dr. Leon Eidelman said that such a law would “violate the rules of international ethics.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

He added that the professional organization’s position on forced feeding of prisoners was clear: “Hunger strikers – including security prisoners – may not be fed against their will if they are able to voice their positions and understand the significance of the refusal to accept medical treatment.”

In a letter sent last Thursday to Justice Minister Tzipi Livni, Eidelman expressed his “great concern” about the bill being prepared in her office.

The issue of political hunger strikers “is a difficult and painful one. No one wants to see the death of another human, and it is worse for doctors not to take action to treat people who harm themselves and starve to death. But at the same time, the prohibition against force-feeding of prisoners is among the clear and solid ethical principles in the modern and enlightened world,” he wrote.

This principle, Eidelman continued, was aimed at preventing harm to a human being’s autonomy.

It is based on the 1991 Malt Declaration of the World Medical Association. In fact, Prof. George Annas, the noted bioethicist at the Boston University School of Public Health, has stated in the New England Journal of Medicine that the forced feeding of a person who is able to decide for himself “is not the practice of medicine; it is aggravated assault.” Eidelman, an anesthesiologist by profession, demanded that the Justice Ministry reconsider its position.

“Experience from dealing with mass hunger strikes of people under arrest and prisoners,” he concluded, “has shown that doctors in the Israel Prison Service and hospitals where they were treated have been successful without forced feeding, and that ‘not a single prisoner has died’ in this way. The doctors have also been praised by the International Red Cross.”

No comment was issued by the Justice Ministry’s spokesman.

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Weizmann scientists bring nature back to artificially selected lab mice