Analysis: New urgency for Obama’s Syria choices

Forewarnings of an assault by Assad on Aleppo echo the daunting days before Gaddafi descended on Benghazi.

By JERUSALEM POST CORRESPONDENT
June 12, 2013 21:37
2 minute read.
US President Barack Obama.

Obama talking with his hands 370. (photo credit: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

WASHINGTON – Significant shifts on the ground in Syria last week might provide the White House with more justification for action than it has found over months of paralyzing stasis in the country’s civil war.

As President Barack Obama continues a series of meetings this week in which he is expected to reevaluate US policy on direct involvement in the brutal conflict, evidence that Assad may suddenly but definitively be winning the war has created a sense of urgency to help the rebels while outside assistance can still prove fruitful.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The loss of Qusair, a city central to supply routes from rebel-held central provinces to the Assad-loyalist Western corridor bordering Lebanon, has motivated Assad to march on to an already devastated Homs and Aleppo, the country’s largest city. Assad government officials have warned local outlets to prepare for a significant offensive in the coming days.

Those forewarnings echo the daunting days before Libya’s Col. Muammar Gaddafi prepared to descend on Benghazi in 2011, at the time a stronghold of rebel forces. Western powers justified intervention at the UN Security Council on humanitarian grounds, and in announcing US involvement in the eventual no-fly zone that NATO put into place, Obama said he feared for the fate of local Libyans as Gaddafi made final battle preparations.

Click for full JPost coverage

Hezbollah’s bold leap into the Syrian conflict – the first foray of its kind for the Lebanese paramilitary group – has also changed the calculus.

A reported 5,000 Hezbollah fighters have crossed the border to assist in the coming offensive.



Leading congressmen on foreign policy have renewed their push for more aggressive US involvement in recent days. Sens John McCain and Bob Corker – ranking members on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – have called for direct arming and training of Syrian rebel fighters.

Analysts tell The Jerusalem Post that Assad’s war with rebel factions is far from over. But the opposition is in dire straits, with a lack of sufficient arms, training and leadership – required elements in a military force that take time to acquire and develop.

As the conditions for rebels continue to deteriorate, Obama’s options this week will further be set in contrast, underscored by the urgency on the ground and the knowledge that indecision at such a pivotal moment in the conflict will have direct consequences on the outcome of the war’s next stage.

Related Content

Russia's Ambassador to Finland Pavel Kuznetsov (L) welcomes Russian President Vladimir Putin
July 16, 2018
Trump-Putin summit could pave way to Mideast war, or avert it

By CHARLES BYBELEZER/THE MEDIA LINE