Clinton says Pakistan sees threat from insurgents

April 23, 2009 22:47
3 minute read.


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Pakistan is beginning to recognize the severity of the threat posed by an extremist insurgency that is encroaching on major urban areas, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Thursday. Clinton told a House of Representatives Appropriations subcommittee that the Obama administration is working to convince the Pakistani government that its traditional focus on India as a threat has to shift to Islamic extremists. "Changing paradigms and mind-sets is not easy, but I do believe there is an increasing awareness of not just the Pakistani government but the Pakistani people that this insurgency coming closer and closer to major cities does pose such a threat," she said. On Wednesday, Clinton told another House committee that in her view the Pakistani government is "basically abdicating to the Taliban and the extremists." She said Thursday that the administration's special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Richard Holbrooke, has had "painful, specific" conversations with a wide range of Pakistanis about the need to act more effectively against the insurgents. "There is a significant opportunity here for us working in collaboration with the Pakistani government to help them get the support they need to make that mindset change and act more vigorously against this threat," she said. "There are no promises. They have to do it." Clinton encountered skepticism from some committee members who expressed doubt about succeeding in Pakistan. Democratic Rep. David Obey, told her he worries that the administration's policy agenda, domestic and foreign, could be "devoured" by the Pakistan-Afghanistan problem. "I have absolutely no confidence in the ability of the existing Pakistan government to do one blessed thing," Obey said. Rep. Nita Lowey, also a Democrat and the committee chairwoman, expressed similar worries. "The escalating terrorist violence in Pakistan and that government's inability and unwillingness to confront the extremist threat undermine any progress we have made in Afghanistan and complicates future efforts there," Lowey said. During the past seven years, the US government has provided Pakistan with upward of $12 billion in aid, of which about two-thirds was from a variety of security-related programs. The rest was economic aid. Nearly half of the $12 billion was from a Pentagon fund created in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks against the United States to reimburse Pakistan for its support of US military operations in the region. President Barack Obama asked Congress on March 27 to pass legislation authorizing $1.5 billion in new aid to Pakistan every year for the next five years, but he also said there would be no "blank check" and the Pakistani government must demonstrate its commitment to rooting out violent extremists. Obey asked whether a year was a reasonable time for determining whether the Pakistani government was showing enough initiative and resolve to merit continued US financial and political support. Clinton said she could not put a timetable on how long it might take to get results, but said the administration intends to provide Congress with benchmarks for measuring progress. "We want to see progress on these measurements, and we want to see the progress beginning and continuing, and not stopping and starting," she said. One measure of progress in Pakistan, Clinton said, is the extent to which the Pakistani military is shifting its troops from the Indian border to the Afghan border, where the Taliban threat has been expanding. Clinton was appearing before the Appropriations Committee panel that is reviewing the administration's request for $7.1 billion in additional money for the State Department this budget year. Of that total, $497 million would be for State Department support of Pakistan and $980 million would be for Afghanistan. About $482 million would be for Iraq. Clinton defended Obama's effort to engage diplomatically with Iran, calling it a reasonable alternative to what she called a failed Bush administration policy. "We tried the policy of total isolation for eight years," she said in a rising voice, "and it did not deter Iran one bit. The nuclear program has continued unabated. They weren't supporting Hamas before. They are supporting Hamas now." Clinton said it remains unclear whether international pressure on Iran will compel it to change course. "Sanctions are a tool for us to leverage pressure on the Iranian regime to change behavior that we obviously consider serious threats," she said. "And so we are talking with our partners about additional sanctions as part of an incentives-disincentives approach to Iran."

Related Content

July 18, 2018
Zuckerberg: Facebook won’t delete Holocaust denial posts