Karsenty convicted of defamation in al-Dura case

French media analyst had accused France 2 of doctoring video showing death of a Palestinian boy in iconic 2nd intifada footage.

June 26, 2013 20:35
1 minute read.
Phillippe Karsenty.

Philippe Karsenty al Dura critic 370. (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)

French media analyst Phillipe Karsenty was convicted of defamation for accusing French state television of doctoring a video showing the death of a Palestinian boy.

The Paris Court of Appeals, which had overturned Karsenty’s libel conviction in 2008, convicted Karsenty on Wednesday and fined him about $9,000 in his long-running case against the France 2 station.

France 2 and its Israel correspondent, Charles Enderlin, sued Karsenty for defamation in 2004 following his claims that a video report by Enderlin on the killing of 12-year-old Mohammed al-Dura in Gaza in 2000 was doctored. Karsenty claimed the footage of al-Dura crouching with his father behind a barricade as bullets whizzed overhead was a hoax.

The footage became an icon of the second Palestinian intifada.

Karsenty was convicted of libel in 2006, but the Paris appeals court overturned the verdict. Last year, France’s highest court overturned the appeals court verdict, which led to Wednesday’s decision.

In returning the case to the appeals court, the high court said the appeals court had overstepped its bounds in ordering France 2 to send it the rushes of the report, according to the French news agency AFP.

Israel initially took responsibility for the shooting of al-Dura, but a subsequent investigation by its military found that the bullets likely came from Palestinian gunmen. Last month, an official Israeli government report concluded that al-Dura was not hit by Israeli gunfire and did not die in the exchange of fire.

Related Content

October 13, 2019
Labour Party faces bankruptcy amid antisemitism allegations


Cookie Settings