Vietnam mulls freeing 10,000 inmates for Lunar New Year

December 27, 2008 07:39


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Vietnam is considering the release of some 10,000 prisoners under a presidential amnesty to mark Lunar New Year, a senior Vietnamese official said Saturday. The four-day Lunar New Year festival, known as Tet, starts January 26, and is the most important holiday in communist Vietnam's calendar. Maj. Nguyen Van Ninh of the Public Security Ministry said inmates imprisoned for serious national security violations, organized crime, child sex abuse or drug-related offenses would not be eligible for release under the amnesty. The government said it has authorized the release of hundreds of thousands of prisoners since 2000 under amnesties to mark New Year, Independence Day and Reunification Day, and that some 4.6 percent of them re-offended.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

April 23, 2019
Do not accept the 'retaliation' narrative for Sri Lanka - analysis