'IAEA: Iran can now build nuclear bomb'

Iran can now build the

By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER, AP
September 18, 2009 00:13

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Experts at the IAEA are in agreement that Teheran has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and is on the way to developing a missile system able to carry an atomic warhead, according to a secret report seen by The Associated Press on Thursday. The document drafted by senior officials at the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency is the clearest indication yet that the agency's leaders share Washington's views on Iran's weapon-making capabilities. It appears to be the so-called "secret annex" on Teheran's nuclear program that Washington says is being withheld by the IAEA's chief. According to the document, the Islamic republic has "sufficient information" to build a bomb. Iran is likely to "overcome problems" on developing a delivery system, according to the report. However, the IAEA denied the AP report. "With respect to a recent media report, the IAEA reiterates that it has no concrete proof that there is or has been a nuclear weapons program in Iran," the statement said. Coincidentally on Thursday, US President Barack Obama shelved a Bush-era plan for an Eastern European missile defense shield that has been a major irritant in relations with Russia. A redesigned defensive system would be cheaper and more effective against any threat from Iranian missiles, the president said. Anticipating criticism from the Right that he was weakening America's security, Obama said repeatedly that his decision would provide more protection, not less. "It is more comprehensive than the previous program, it deploys capabilities that are proven and cost-effective, and it sustains and builds upon our commitment to protect the US homeland," Obama said in a statement released by the White House. With the announcement, Washington scrapped what had become a politically troublesome plan, one the Defense Department now says was ill-suited to the true threat from Iran. In its place would be a system the Pentagon contends would accomplish the original goal and more. US Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Iran's changing capabilities had driven the decision, but he acknowledged that the replacement system would probably allay some of Russia's concerns. The plan for a European shield was a darling of the Bush administration, which reached deals to install 10 interceptors in Poland and a radar system in the Czech Republic, both Eastern European nations at Russia's doorstep and once under Soviet sway. Moscow argued vehemently that the system would undermine the nuclear deterrent of its vast arsenal. "Its concerns about our previous missile defense programs were entirely unfounded," Obama said, speaking of Russia. In Jerusalem, meanwhile, one assessment of the move was that it would significantly improve US-Russian ties and could be part of a US trade-off with Russia, whereby Moscow might now be more willing to impose stiff sanctions on Iran to get it to stop its nuclear program. "Obama made a huge gesture to the Russians, and now they owe him, and what they owe him could be something having to [do] with Iran," one senior government source said. The announcement came on the eve of two important meetings in the US that will deal with the Iranian nuclear issue: the G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh of the leaders of the world's leading economies, and the UN General Assembly meeting in New York. The possibility of imposing sanctions on Iran will be discussed at both forums. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev will be attending both meetings. On Tuesday, he seemed to hint at a possible policy reversal on the Iran-sanction issues, saying that while sanctions were not very effective on the whole, "sometimes you have to embark on sanctions, and they can be right." Until now, Moscow, along with Beijing, has been very reluctant to impose significant sanctions on Teheran, saying it doubted their effectiveness. In fact, last week both Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov expressed opposition to sanctions. Medvedev's comment indicated, however, that there might be a softening of the Russian position, and its timing so close to Obama's announcement led to speculation that the two things might be related to removal of the missile shield. The expectation in Israel, officials said, was that the US would deploy additional missile defense systems in the area to help defend against the Iranian threat. The different options will come up in talks Defense Minister Ehud Barak will hold in Washington next week. Barak, officials said, was scheduled to leave on Sunday night for the US for meetings with Gates and National Security Adviser James Jones. "Missile defense will feature prominently on Barak's agenda during his talks with Gates," one official said. "We understand from the Americans that Israel is going to be part of the missile defense shield that they are creating in the face of Iran." The IAF's Air Defense Division will hold a joint drill, called Juniper Cobra, with the US military's European Command and the US Missile Defense Agency next month, in what is being described as the largest joint exercise ever held by the countries. They will test three different ballistic missile defense systems. Officials said it was possible that the US would decide to leave some systems in Israel following the drill, to bolster Israeli defenses in the face of Iran. One possibility under discussion is that Aegis ships, which carry SM3 missile interceptors, will be deployed in the Mediterranean and Red seas. Obama phoned Czech Prime Minister Jan Fischer on Wednesday night and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk on Thursday morning to alert them to his decision. It was not clear whether Washington also informed Russia. In Moscow, Medvedev called the decision a "responsible move." It was also unclear whether any part of the future system would be hosted by those nations, which agreed to handle the Bush-planned shield at considerable cost in public opinion and to their relations with Russia. Gates said they might, and said he hoped Poland would still approve a broad military cooperation agreement with the United States. Criticism came immediately from Republicans. Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the second-ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, said he would "work to overturn this wrong-headed policy." "Scrapping our missile defense effort in Europe has severe consequences for our diplomatic relations and weakens our national security," Cantor said in a statement. "Our allies, especially Poland and the Czech Republic, deserve better, and our people deserve smarter and safer." Democrat-turned-Independent Sen. Joseph Lieberman also sharply criticized Obama's announcement. Lieberman, who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, called it a "deeply regrettable decision" that "sends the wrong message to Teheran, Moscow and our European allies at a critical time in our effort to stop Iran's nuclear weapons program." He said the result, contrary to Obama's contention, would be a "less capable missile defense system" to protect the US and Europe, and called on the administration to demonstrate how the alternate system to be used would be effective against long-range missiles that could threaten Europe and even the United States. He also expressed concern about how the move would be perceived by European countries the US had long courted on the issue. "The administration must take immediate and tangible action to reassure our allies in Central and Eastern Europe that we are committed to their security and independence," he stressed. However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat and the chamber's top official, called the policy change "brilliant." "That they have reevaluated the threat; that they have taken into consideration what the technology - advanced technologies are now; what this means to our relationship in NATO; and what this means in our bilateral relationship with Russia is very, very important." The new plan would rely on a network of sea- land- and air-based sensors and interceptor missiles as a bulwark against Iranian short- and medium-range missiles. The Bush missile shield plan, which never moved beyond the blueprint stage, would have been a deterrent for Iranian long-range missiles, but Russians worried that the system would be aimed at them. Gates said the initial stage of Obama's alternate plan would deploy Aegis ships armed with interceptors, giving the military the ability to move the system around. Another key to the near-term network would be new, more mobile radar used to detect and track short- and medium-range missiles that had been launched from Iran. Gates said a second phase of the plan would add a modified version of a land-based missile that would not be ready until 2015. Gates said the decision to abandon the Bush administration's plans came about because of a change in the US perception of the threat posed by Iran. US intelligence decided short- and medium-range missiles from Iran now posed a greater near-term threat than the intercontinental ballistic missiles the Bush plan dealt with, he said. NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen called the US decision "a positive step." Meanwhile, Fischer said he was "pretty sure" the US announcement would have a positive impact on ties with Moscow, and rejected suggestions that the decision would hurt relations with Eastern European nations that fear Russia's influence in the region.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations

By YONAH JEREMY BOB