6 powers agree on need for sanctions on Iran; differ on severity

Ahmadinejad: "The day sanctions are imposed on Iran by its enemies, would be a day of national celebration for the Iranian nation."

February 22, 2010 17:29
4 minute read.
6 powers agree on need for sanctions on Iran; differ on severity

Ahmadinejad dont mess. (photo credit: AP)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The five permanent members of the UN Security Council have agreed to start working on UN sanctions against Iran next week but have failed to bridge differences on how harsh the penalties should be, diplomats and officials said. They told The Associated Press that while the US called for broad sanctions to punish Iran's nuclear defiance, Russian and Chinese representatives at a top-level Vienna meeting Wednesday favored less severe measures. The diplomats and government officials demanded anonymity in exchange for discussing the confidential meeting of the five Security Council countries and Germany - the six powers whose repeated attempts to entice Iran to enter nuclear negotiations finally broke down last week over Tehran's refusal to give up uranium enrichment. In New York, US Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told the Council on Foreign Relations that package of incentives meant to persuade Iran to halt uranium enrichment remained on the table. But he said Iran's stance left little choice but to "head back to the Security Council in a couple of days, at the end of this week or early next ... to begin the process of writing and then passing, we hope, a sanctions resolution that will raise the cost to the Iranians of what they are doing in the nuclear round." Reflecting the importance of the meeting, Russia, Britain, France and Germany sent top negotiators directly answerable to their foreign ministers, while the US and China were represented by their chief representatives to the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency. Burns participated via video hookup. One of the diplomats, who had been briefed on the substance of the meeting, said that while Burns had urged broad sanctions - such as a total ban on missile and nuclear technology sales -the Russians and Chinese backed prohibitions of selected items as a first step. As well, he said, the Chinese and Russian envoys had called for renewed negotiations with the Iranians in parallel to working on sanctions to punish Tehran for defying a Security Council demand that it freeze enrichment, a possible pathway to nuclear arms. Burns told the Council on Foreign Relations that the countries trying to stop Iran's programs "had come to a fork in the road," adding that despite a substantial package of cooperation with Tehran and an offer of direct negotiations with the United States, Iran "turned us down." "If at any time the Iranians wish to come forward and negotiate with the United States and these other countries, then we'll be very happy to do so," Burns said. The differences reflected continued divisions over how harshly to penalize the Islamic republic for ignoring a Security Council deadline to stop all enrichment activities by the end of August. Russia and China, which have strategic and economic interests with Iran, have recently swung behind the Americans and Europeans in agreeing to the need for sanctions but have publicly opposed attempts to make them too severe. "All agree for the need for sanctions but there are problems with how harsh they should be," said one of the diplomats, whose country is accredited to the IAEA. He said North Korea and its claim to have tested a nuclear bomb was not directly discussed but all participants agreed that juggling two nuclear crises had complicated international nonproliferation efforts. Iran, OPEC's No. 2 producer of crude, is apparently ready to face the threat of sanctions because it is confident they will be more symbolic than damaging due to international concerns any tough penalties could move Teheran to retaliate by cutting off oil exports. Restating his country's defiance, Iran's hard-line president was quoted by state television Wednesday as saying that "the day sanctions are imposed on Iran by its enemies, would be a day of national celebration for the Iranian nation." In separate comments earlier, President Mahmoud Ahmdinejad called the prospect of sanctions "a hollow threat." "These three or four countries are bullying, they have no right to intervene," he said, in allusion to the United States and its European allies, France, Britain and Germany. "The Security Council has no right to intervene." The Security Council demanded an enrichment stop after the Iran ignored calls from the IAEA to suspend such activities until doubts about the country's nuclear program have been cleared. Uranium must be enriched before it can be used in either nuclear reactors or atomic weapons. Senior EU negotiator Javier Solana had met with top Iranian negotiator Ali Larijani over the past few weeks in a new attempt to persuade Tehran to suspend enrichment and start nuclear talks with the six-nation alliance. But those talks failed last week over Iran's refusal to freeze enrichment even for a limited time. While the representatives of five of the six nations at the Vienna talks subsequently met with IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, the Americans did not attend, said a UN diplomat. There was no reason given for their absence, but one of the diplomats speculated it could have been a show of US displeasure with ElBaradei, whom Washington in the past has accused of being too soft on Iran.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations