(photo credit: Associated Press)
WASHINGTON – Western negotiators expressed deep disappointment on Saturday after
talks with Iran ended without yielding progress or even paving the way for
another round of negotiations.
RELATED:Tony Blair: West must prepare to confront Iran'We won't allow discussion of nuclear enrichment freeze'
“We had hoped to embark on a discussion of
practical ways forward, and have made every effort to make that happen,” EU
foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said in a statement after the conclusion
of two days of discussions in Istanbul over international efforts to halt Iran’s
nuclear program. “I am disappointed to say that this has not been
As Iran talks begin, Israel urges forceful action
Iran begins nuclear talks with 6 world powers in Turkey
Ashton noted that the so-called P5+1 of negotiating countries
– England, France, Germany, the United States, Russia and China – had put offers
of confidence- building steps on the table that they hoped Iran would seize.
These included an updated deal over a nuclear fuel exchange program agreed
between the sides in 2009 but never implemented, and a better means of
monitoring Iran’s nuclear activities.
“We had hoped to have a detailed
and constructive discussion of those ideas. But it became clear that the Iranian
side was not ready for this, unless we agreed to preconditions relating to
enrichment and sanctions,” she said. “Both these pre-conditions are not a way to
Iran, however, charged its international interlocutors with
setting the preconditions.
Iranian chief negotiator Saeed Jalili said his
negotiating team had gone “far and beyond what was expected of us” to reach
agreement and accused the other side of pushing not “dialogue, but
He also told the semiofficial news agency Press TV, “We are
still prepared for further negotiations with the P5+1, based on common
[We are] prepared for comprehensive talks.”
concluded her statement by indicating that the group of world powers continued
to be open to dialogue with Teheran and to pursing a diplomatic
“The door remains open, the choice remains in Iran’s hands,”
she said, adding that “we are ready to start talking without preconditions the
moment Iran is ready.”
But Ashton indicated that with no immediate
progress, the international group of negotiators had no intention of relaxing
sanctions in the short term, despite Iranian appeals to do so as a way of easing
the path to negotiations.
“As far as the removal of sanctions is
concerned, it remains our united position that this would accompany the
re-establishment of confidence in the Iranian nuclear program rather than be a
precondition for discussing it,” she said, noting that the sanctions imposed by
the UN, for starters, have requirements for sanctions to be lifted that have not
During the talks, a senior US administration official pointed
to efforts by the Iranians to split the six during “long and difficult” talks to
extract concessions, but delegates from the world powers remained
A diplomat from one of the six world powers at the talks said no
new UN sanctions had been planned in response to Iran’s defiance. Instead, he
said, there would be stricter enforcement of existing penalties. Both he and the
US official asked for anonymity because their information was
The two-day meetings in Istanbul were themselves a follow-
up to a round of talks between Iran and the P5+1 held in Geneva in December,
where the most concrete sign of progress was the agreement to another set of
This time, no such plans were forthcoming, suggesting a
deepening of the impasse between the two sides.
Ahead of the talks, a
bipartisan group of eight US senators expressed concern that the Obama
administration would accede to Iran’s major demand that it maintain a domestic
uranium enrichment capability as part of a compromise.
with Iran continue, we hope that the US will make clear that the current Iranian
regime does not have a ‘right’ to uranium enrichment or reprocessing, and that
it will not be allowed to possess enrichment or reprocessing capabilities on its
territory under any conditions,” the letter states.
The US and the five
other world powers have frequently referred to Iran’s right to peaceful nuclear
energy, but have so far distinguished between that capacity and the ability to
enrich uranium domestically.
Sanctions expert Mark Dubowitz, executive
director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said the senators were
writing out of concern that as talks with Iran continue, the US needs to clarify
for itself an endgame that would be acceptable – and that these lawmakers want
to make sure domestic enrichment for Iran doesn’t suddenly become palatable to
the US in its desire to make a deal.
“Everybody supports the
administration’s focus on sanctions” at this point, Dubowitz said, noting that
the concerns are down the road: “What does a good deal look like? What’s the US
willing to give in to the Iranians?” He explained, “I think there’s some deep
concern that since the Iranians are insisting on this... to find some kind of
facesaving mechanism to get a deal that this will be on the table, that the
Iranians will insist on the right of domestic enrichment and the US will fashion
a deal that leaves them with the right.”
AP contributed to this report.