Peres: Talk of us hitting Iran is absurd

President's remarks come after Gates warns against dangerous consequences of attacking nuclear sites.

By
April 16, 2009 08:39
1 minute read.
Peres: Talk of us hitting Iran is absurd

Natanz 248.88. (photo credit: AP [file])

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Speculation that Israel might launch an attack against Iran in order to rid itself of a nuclear threat was dismissed as "nonsense" by President Shimon Peres on Thursday. The matter was broached in discussion between Peres and US special envoy George Mitchell, with reference to the warning by US Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates that an Israeli strike against Iran would have dangerous consequences. Gates, in a meeting with Marine Corps students earlier this week, conceded that a strike might delay the Iranian nuclear program by as much as three years, but said that it would also unify Iran and "cement determination to have a nuclear program." Iran's acquisition of a nuclear bomb could be prevented only if the "Iranians themselves decided it's too costly," he said. Peres told Mitchell that a military solution to the Iranian nuclear threat was not an option, and once again said that a united front on the part of the United States and Europe would prove to be a deterrant. Mitchell assured Peres that America was totally committed to Israel's security. He also reiterated America's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The two men also discussed Durban II. Peres was highly critical of the fact that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had been invited as a guest of honor to the conference, and questioned the ability of the conference participants to stop the supply of arms to Gaza. Israel would not tolerate the continuation of weapons smuggling nor would Israel wait with folded arms until such time as rockets were aimed at Tel Aviv, said Peres, who stressed that any attempts to rebuild Gaza must conducted in a fashion that assures that Hamas does not get hold of any of the funds, but they are used solely for the purpose for which they are intended. Peres also noted that Arab leaders are concerned about Iranian ambitions to rule the whole of the Middle East. With regard to US President Barack Obama's plans to bring peace to the region, Peres told Mitchell that they are in line with those of Israel. Israel has always been interested in having peace in the region, said Peres, but not at the expense of its own security.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations

By YONAH JEREMY BOB