Tehran mayor: Holocaust denial damaged Iran

Possible presidential candidate says Ahmadinejad's Holocaust denial became excuse for Israel, harmed Palestinians.

April 25, 2013 05:46
2 minute read.
Tehran mayor Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf 370. (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For a symbolic $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s denial of the Holocaust has harmed Iran’s foreign relations and did nothing to benefit the Palestinians, the mayor of Tehran – a potential candidate for the Iranian presidential elections – said in an interview with the Tasnim News Agency this week.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said in excerpts translated from Farsi by Al- Monitor that Ahmadinejad’s statements denying the systematic extermination of six million Jews by Nazi Germany during World War II became an “excuse for our biggest enemies, which are the Zionists, and affected the goals of the Palestinians.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

He added that “defending the goals of the Palestinians is part of the principles of our foreign policy. Denying the Holocaust is not part of our foreign policy.”

According to Ghalibaf, the Islamic Republic was opposed only to Zionism, not to Judaism.

“We’ve been the major supporters of Palestine for 30 years, but with the intelligence of Ayatollahs Khomeini and Khamenei, no one could accuse us of being anti-Semitic,” he said.

“Suddenly, without consideration for the results and implications, the issue of the Holocaust was raised. How did this benefit the revolution or the Palestinians?,” he wondered.

Ghalibaf also maintained that he would do a better job than Ahmadinejad in handling the diplomacy surrounding the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program.

“Steps were taken and words were said that not only did not help us push our programs forward, but it also gave our opponents the opportunity to gather others against us. Controversial but useless remarks and slogans and presentations struck a blow against us and weakened our rightful position,” he said.

Only an “intelligent and rational diplomacy” could help handle the sanctions imposed on Iran by Western countries, Ghalibaf claimed.

“There was a time when they used to say the sanctions are torn pieces of paper. Now they are saying that they are crippling, and they are the cause of all the problems... A rational view says that the sanctions are neither torn pieces of paper, nor will removing them fix all of the problems,” he said.

He also asserted that negotiations with the US over Tehran’s nuclear program are a valid tool, but stressed they won’t solve all of the Islamic Republic’s problems.

“When it’s necessary at points, we will certainly negotiate with America.

Negotiating with America has never been a red line for us,” he said.

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations