White House rejects notion of Iran deadlines

National Security Council spokesman: What is important is how the engagement can move ahead.

By HILARY LEILA KRIEGER, JPOST CORRESPONDENT IN WASHINGTON
April 29, 2009 23:33
2 minute read.
White House rejects notion of Iran deadlines

barack obama wave 248.88. (photo credit: AP [file])

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The White House rejected the notion of putting timelines on its engagement with Iran Wednesday and indicated that its efforts could take a significant amount of time. While not opposing talks with Iran, Israel has been concerned that the Islamic republic would use the opportunity of negotiations to run out the clock on its nuclear program, and would like to see a time limit set to prevent such a scenario as well as to ratchet up pressure for Iranian compliance. But White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer told foreign journalists Wednesday that "it's not appropriate at this time to be trying to establish timetables, but rather seeing how the engagement can move forward." He said the US was not looking for "talk for the sake of talk," but that "there are opportunities there for us to engage with the Iranian government." So far, he acknowledged that Iranian reactions to US overtures had been "mixed," as Iranian leaders had at times welcomed US President Barack Obama's efforts to appeal to the Iranian government, and at others put down such moves. But he took that as an indication that engagement, which he defended as "worthwhile," could be slow going. "We are in a process that we expect will take some time," he said. "We've had a difficult - at best - relationship in the past with Iran, and we're looking to see what is possible. But we're under no illusions that there will be any change in the near term." How the US and Israel each approach Iran is expected to be a major subject of conversations between Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu during their first meeting in Washington in mid-May. It has also come up in conversations that top US officials have had with moderate Arab leaders, who have also expressed concern behind closed doors over the Iranian nuclear program and how the pace of US talks could give Teheran too much latitude. Obama hosted King Abdullah of Jordan last week, in his first visit from a Middle East leader. Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas are expected as well in the coming month. Hammer said Wednesday that the Obama administration wanted to hear more from these key players about "what is possible" in moving the Arab-Israeli peace process forward before fleshing out the steps Obama would like each side to take - steps to which he alluded during Abdullah's visit. Abdullah asked that Obama not only prod both Israelis and Palestinians toward a two-state solution, but also that the president himself present a proposal for resolving the issues confronting the parties. "The initiative, in a sense, is what already is happening," Hammer said when asked about the White House presenting its own plan, referring to the frequent visits of high-level envoy George Mitchell and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the region. "We have a president who is putting a high premium [on] seeing if we can make progress in the Middle East."

Related Content

Bushehr nuclear Iranian
August 5, 2014
Iran and the bomb: The future of negotiations

By YONAH JEREMY BOB