10 trends in Israel’s regional foreign policies

Every six months, the Mitvim Institute maps key trends in Israel’s regional foreign policies based on the institute’s monthly reports that monitor ongoing developments.

By ROEE KIBRIK,
August 20, 2019 21:28
10 trends in Israel’s regional foreign policies

The new Likud posters show Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. (photo credit: ANNA AHRONHEIM)

Every six months, the Mitvim Institute maps key trends in Israel’s regional foreign policies based on the institute’s monthly reports that monitor ongoing developments. From January-June 2019, we identified the following 10 trends:



1) Party leaders utilize foreign policy as an election campaign tool but avoid in-depth discussion of the issues. 

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu used the foreign policy arena to boost his 2019 election campaigns, instigating meetings with foreign leaders in a bid to underscore his international standing and diplomatic influence. Opposition parties, too, tried to utilize the diplomatic arena to upgrade their standing. Labor’s Avi Gabbay visited the UAE; Blue and White’s Benny Gantz addressed AIPAC and the Munich Security Conference; Blue and White’s Yair Lapid met with French President Emmanuel Macron; and Meretz chairwoman Tamar Zandberg met with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. However, the issues themselves, including the peace process with the Palestinians, were relegated to the sidelines of public discourse.
2) Netanyahu openly announces policy goals he concealed in the past.

Netanyahu has traditionally avoided explicit declarations regarding his goals on sensitive foreign policy issues, however, a shift is underway. In 2018, he declared that Israel was seeking to deepen divisions among member states of the EU to prevent consensus against Israeli policies, and stepped back from the Israeli policy of ambiguity regarding attacks on Iranian targets in Syria. In the first half of 2019 he added clear statements about Israeli efforts to maintain the Palestinian split between the West Bank and Gaza Strip, in order to avoid the need for progress in peace negotiations, and saying that Israel was seeking to advance de facto annexation of settlements. Netanyahu takes advantage of strong backing by the Trump administration to openly promote policies deviating from international norms, without incurring significant opposition.


3) Israel avoids war in Gaza, props up Hamas regime and undermines the Palestinian Authority. 

Despite several rounds of escalation that nearly resulted in a broad military offensive in the Gaza Strip, Israel opted to avoid war. It negotiated with Hamas, agreed to mediation by Qatar, Egypt and the UN, and approved the transfer of large sums of Qatari money to Gaza. In doing so, the Israeli government sought to preserve Hamas rule and fuel the internal Palestinian split in order to undermine the feasibility of a two-state solution. At the same time, Israel weakened the PA by withholding tax money it collects for the Palestinians, and then tried to limit the damage in order to avoid the authority’s collapse and ensure its continued security coordination with the Israelis.


4) Israel cooperates with the Trump plan but keeps a low profile.

Repeated delays in unveiling the plan enabled the Israeli government to put a positive face on its response without having to clash with the US administration over specific details, which it might find less palatable. Israel’s anxiety over the plan ebbed the closer its coordination with Trump’s envoys became, and it welcomed the US decision to present the economic part of the plan first, avoiding the need to express any opinion on political aspects. Nonetheless, the economic plan did envision a link between the Gaza Strip and West Bank, which runs counter to Israel’s policy of driving a wedge between the two Palestinian territories.


5) Ties with Egypt grow warmer while those with Jordan cool down. 

As Israel and Egypt marked the 40th anniversary of their peace treaty, economic and defense ties were growing stronger – as publicly manifested in a declaration by President Fattah el-Sisi on security cooperation with Israel and an invitation to Energy Minister Yuval Steinitz to the Cairo launch of the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum. Other ties are still very limited, despite Israeli efforts to connect with the Egyptian public through social media and increasing Israeli tourism to Sinai. Relations with Jordan, on the other hand, have deteriorated with heightened tensions over Israeli policy on Jerusalem and large opposition in Jordan to normalization. There are no indications of an Israeli effort to reverse this trend.


6) Israel promotes alignments and cooperation in the Eastern Mediterranean. 

Israel played a generally positive role in the Eastern Mediterranean, supported Egyptian and Cypriot efforts to forge new regional alignments, kept boosting its trilateral alliance with Greece and Cyprus, and preserved ties with Turkey while making new appointments at its diplomatic missions there. Israel cooperated with American efforts to mediate between it and Lebanon in a bid to launch maritime border negotiations. During the first half of 2019, Israel avoided intervention in tensions between Cyprus and Turkey over gas drilling.


7) Netanyahu develops ties with populist and far-right leaders amid growing Israeli understanding of the cost. 

The rise in power of far-right actors around the world raises questions regarding Israel’s policy toward ties with them and its willingness to compromise on historic memory and antisemitism. Israel has yet to formulate a coherent policy on the issue, although it continues to boycott the far-right parties in Austria and Germany. However, due to an ideological affinity with the global non-liberal axis and a desire to generate pro-Israel policies, Netanyahu bolstered ties with controversial leaders such as Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro, Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, Italy’s Matteo Salvini and Russia’s Vladimir Putin. The crisis with Poland over Holocaust commemoration pointed to the limitations of this policy, as did opposition on the part of Jewish Diaspora communities and other Israeli actors.
 
8) Crisis deepening with US Jewry and the Democratic Party.

Suspicions of corruption against Netanyahu and the seal of approval he gave far-right parties in Israel; political campaigns with racist and fascist overtones; campaigns against civil society and BDS activists; profiling at border checkpoints; reported arms sales in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe; and attempts to curb the Supreme Court’s authority and ensure immunity from prosecution for Netanyahu – all of this generated international contempt and further eroded Israel’s image as a liberal democracy. Along with Israeli moves to undermine the two-state solution, these developments deepened the crisis with US Jewry (incurring unusual AIPAC criticism) and led to unprecedented and harsh personal criticism by presidential candidates from the Democratic Party against Israel’s prime minister.


9) Israel digs itself into diplomatic holes and then seeks a way out.

After encouraging a tough US stance on Iran, Israel seemed anxious about a possible US military operation and toned down its rhetoric. After encouraging American criticism of the PA, Israel asked the US to ease its pressure to prevent the authority’s collapse. After making allowances for the Polish Holocaust Law, Israel understood that it had gone too far and adopted damage control measures, with criticism of the Poles resulting in Poland’s cancellation of a planned Visegrad Group summit in Jerusalem. After making the transfer of foreign embassies to Jerusalem a central policy goal, following the US Embassy relocation, Israel scaled back its rhetoric on the issue given its limited success.


10) Efforts are ongoing to boost the Foreign Ministry’s standing and authority. 

The status and budget of Israel’s Foreign Ministry continued to decline and, ahead of the April 2019 elections, opposition parties and civil society began calling for change. Netanyahu appointed Israel Katz as foreign minister. The ministry cooperated with other government agencies to fight looming budget cuts and tried to boost public awareness of the importance of diplomacy and of the need to upgrade its status. Former diplomats stepped up their public activity, speaking out against the ministry’s eroding standing and Netanyahu’s intention (which fell through) to name a controversial political associate, Ayoub Kara, as Israel’s ambassador to Egypt.
 
Dr. Roee Kibrik is director of research at Mitvim–The Israeli Institute for Regional Foreign Policies, which Dr. Nimrod Goren founded and heads.


Related Content

September 21, 2019
Women's Middle East peacemaker promoter, now assisting Holocaust victims

By CNAAN LIPHSHIZ/JTA