Australia, EU slam Israel's declaration of 4000 dunams in West Bank as state land

EU ambassador Lars Faaborg-Andersen says sanctions against Israel were not on the agenda now.

By
September 10, 2014 18:31
2 minute read.
Jewish settlement

A section of the controversial Israeli barrier is seen close to a Jewish settlement near Jerusalem . (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

International condemnations over Israel’s declaration of 400 hectares in Gush Etzion as state land 11 days ago are not subsiding, as the EU’s ambassador to Israel and Australia’s foreign minister called on Wednesday for Israel to reverse the decision.

“We are very concerned about the move in Gush Etzion,” EU Ambassador Lars Faaborg-Andersen said at a Jerusalem press briefing. “I delivered the message to Deputy Foreign Minister Tzachi Hanegbi on Monday that this is an alarming development because of the timing.”

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Faaborg-Andersen, who said the EU wanted to see a resumption of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, said this was “one of the worst signals to send in the current situation.” He said that the EU viewed this move as a reversible step, and hopes Israel would reconsider it.

He said that the EU was concerned about “similar plans” for Givat Hamatos, in southern Jerusalem, and wanted these plans to “stay on hold.”

He characterized plans for Givat Hamatos and Gush Etzion as “particularly strategic and damaging” because they would ring southern Jerusalem with settlements, cutting it off from the West Bank.

With that, he said that sanctions against Israel were not on the agenda for now.

Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop, meanwhile, issued a statement saying that in a conversation with Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman on Monday, she said that Australia was “deeply concerned” by the Gush Etzion move, which she described as taking place “south of Bethlehem.”



“The expropriation undermines prospects for a negotiated two-state solution, with Israel and a Palestinian state existing side-by-side in peace and security, within internationally recognized borders – a goal to which Australia remains committed,” she said.

Bishop said that the announcement “is unhelpful so soon after the Gaza conflict,” and called on Israel to reconsider the decision.

What makes Bishop’s statement stand-out from the other somewhat rote and automatic condemnations that continue to come from the US and Europe is that in June, Australia said it would no longer describe east Jerusalem as “occupied territory”: in January, Bishop took issue with calling the settlements illegal; and in November, Australia abstained on two annual anti-Israel resolutions at the UN, one calling for an end to all settlement activities.

A government official, when asked whether Israel would indeed reconsider the move, said that the decision has to go through the legal process, and could go all the way up to the Supreme Court, ensuring there will be adequate “legal review.” There is a 45-day period during which concerned parties can appeal the decision.

Related Content

Moshe Lion
August 14, 2018
J'lem mayoral candidate, Moshe Lion receives boost from labor union

By GIL HOFFMAN