Court rules against doctors for failing to disclose surgery risks

Operation blinded patient in her one good eye

October 2, 2017 17:48
1 minute read.
Haifa’s Rambam Medical Center

Haifa’s Rambam Medical Center. (photo credit: WIKIMEDIA COMMONS/RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The Haifa Magistrate’s Court has ruled that doctors failed to disclose the risks to a patient who was blinded in her second eye by surgery, the court spokesperson announced Monday.

The decision was significant as the court did not only address the specific case, but also set broader parameters for the kinds of medical forms that require extra, more specific and explicit explanations.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

Though the court only removed the gag order on the decision Monday, the court handed down its decision last week.

The patient, born blind in one eye in 1933, was diagnosed in 2007 with a brain tumor that could have endangered her vision in the healthy eye. Her doctors then recommended a series of surgeries to address the issue.

In 2008, the woman underwent the surgeries, which led to her losing vision in what had been her healthy eye.

The heart of the dispute was whether the doctors had warned the patient of the risks of the surgery.

The doctors and the hospital asserted that the patient had signed a disclosure form giving permission for the surgery.


But the court noted that an average person could not be expected to comprehend the convoluted and complicated document.

Even more importantly, the court said that the document the patient signed did not specify the surgeries’ risks.

The hospital said that the risks were explained to the patient verbally. However, the court explained that it was unclear if even those verbal explanations went into any real detail. In any event, absent written documentation of the risks explained, the court would assume they were not explained.

The court said that even if doctors could leave out certain details in internal documents, risks of surgery must be fully specified in writing to patients prior to surgeries.

Such documents are equivalent to a contract, the court said, and the documents used by the hospital did not meet the standards of relevant laws regarding the issue.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a memorial for IDF soldiers killedi in the Yom Kippur War
September 20, 2018
With echoes of downed Russian plane, PM says Israel obligated to continue defending itself