Trial of poet Dareen Tartour: Grand battle of free speech v. incitement

The case has become a symbol of the fault line battle over incitement, free speech and discrimination between the country’s Jewish majority and its Arab minority.

March 28, 2017 20:24
1 minute read.

Gavel [Illustrative]. (photo credit: INIMAGE)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The defense rested Tuesday in the trial of poet Dareen Tartour in the Nazareth Magistrate’s Court, on charges of incitement to perpetrate violence and terror stemming from various online posts, for which she claimed defense on the basis of free speech, mistranslations and persecution of minorities.

Tartour is an Israeli citizen who lives in Reina in the North, but refers to herself as a Palestinian poet.

Around the start of the so-called “Knife Intifada” in October 2015, she wrote posts, which the prosecution said encouraged violence and terrorist acts against Israel. She was indicted on November 2, 2015, and has since spent extensive time in full detention and under house arrest.

The prosecution alleged that she posted images of violence and narrated a call to Palestinians and Israeli-Arabs to undertake a comprehensive intifada and follow the martyrs.

It also noted an “Islamic Jihad newsflash” she posted, calling for an intifada in all of Palestine, including within the Green Line.

The defense’s Arabic literary experts testified that the police’s translator mistranslated to give a violent connotation to what could be a call to nonviolent resistance. They also objected to criminalizing poetry and posts on the basis of free speech protection.

Defense lawyer Nery Ramati asked about enforcement of Israel’s incitement law to try proving it is use disproportionately against Arabs in Israel and Palestinian residents of the West Bank.

On the Internet links presented against Tartour as evidence, activist blogger Yoav Haifawi said the court ruled in favor of defense objections that it could not be proved that content was not edited after they were first presented in court. The next hearing is scheduled for April 27 and the verdict is expected to follow.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Palestinians protest next to the border fence between Israel and the Gaza Strip, March 30, 201
June 25, 2019
Twelve Palestinians injured by IDF fire in anti-Bahrain protest - report


Cookie Settings