High Court sides with former employees against Sara Netanyahu

No grounds for appeal by PM’s wife.

July 11, 2017 18:33
1 minute read.
Sara Netanyahu

Sara Netanyahu. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The High Court of Justice on Tuesday rejected Sara Netanyahu’s appeal of civil judgments against her and in favor of two former employees of the Prime Minister’s Residence.

A three-justice panel said that other than being the prime minister’s wife, her case presented no novel issues of law that could justify her having a right to appeal when technically the monetary damages were against the Prime Minister’s Office – even if publicly the judgments were interpreted as being against her.

In October, the National Labor Court issued a similar ruling upholding judgments by the Jerusalem Labor Court in favor of Meni Naftali and Guy Eliyahu.

In May 2016, Judge Dita Prugnin slammed Sara Netanyahu’s conduct toward Eliyahu and other employees as “insufferable, humiliating and rising to the level of abusive.”

The Netanyahus’ family lawyer, Yossi Cohen, responded at the time that “the real abusive conduct was of Judge Prugnin, who... again ignored... the testimony of Mrs. Netanyahu.”

Despite his attack on Prugnin, the National Labor Court and High Court took the judge’s side.

Lawyer Naomi Landau, who represented Eliyahu, stated in May 2016: “Guy Eliyahu and Meni Naftali are heroes. They stood with courage against powerful evil forces who tried to destroy them... I have never encountered such an evil employer.”

In September 2015, Eliyahu’s lawsuit came under review, focusing on his allegations of being abused, underpaid and overworked.

Eliyahu claimed that Netanyahu asked him “to bring her food, and when I would return with the requested food she would accuse me of trying to make her fat.”

He testified in September 2015 that on one occasion, he was called back to the residence after he had already gone home. It was after midnight and he came back “just...to heat up a bowl of soup for Mrs. Netanyahu.” He also said that upon returning to the residence he was reprimanded by Netanyahu and told that he must come back to the residence no matter the

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

June 27, 2019
Natan Sharansky’s golden award


Cookie Settings