Netanyahu a ‘stalwart’ defender of Supreme Court, PM’s spokesman tells ‘Economist’

PM spokesman pens rare letter to 'Economist,' challenging magazine's assertion that Netanyahu preparing to 'muzzle' the Supreme Court.

May 3, 2015 02:15
1 minute read.
Benjamin Netanyahu

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, April 13, 2015. (photo credit: AMOS BEN GERSHOM, GPO)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


In an indication of the sensitivity with which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu views criticism that he is trying to fiddle with the Supreme Court, his office wrote a letter to the British weekly The Economist at the weekend saying he will “vigorously” uphold the independence of the court.

The rare letter to the editor written by Netanyahu’s spokesman, Mark Regev, followed a critical piece in the May 2 edition of the influential news magazine headline titled, “Netanyahu v the Supreme Court” with the subhead, “The prime minister takes on the judiciary.”

According to the piece, the Supreme Court has “long been a solid pillar of the Jewish state’s democracy,” but now Netanyahu is “preparing for an unprecedented fight to muzzle the court.”

The piece briefly explains that Netanyahu supports an “override clause” amendment, that would limit its ability to overturn laws, and that he also plans to expand the judicial appointments committee by adding another minister and MK to the nine-person panel, giving an edge to politicians over jurists.

“The struggle to limit the powers of the Supreme Court is part of a broader contest over the nature of Israel – pitting religious and nationalist activists against advocates of a more liberal and secular-minded country,” The Economist wrote.

The article concluded: “With Israel facing potential indictments for war crimes at the International Criminal Court, it can ill afford to tarnish the image of its Supreme Court.”

Regev wrote that while The Economist got it “exactly right” in writing that the Supreme Court has long been a solid pillar of Israel’s democracy, it then “proceeded to misrepresent” Netanyahu’s position regarding the court.

Regev characterized Netanyahu as a “stalwart defender of the court” who has “proudly and consistently championed the independence of Israel’s judiciary” during his previous three terms in office.

“He will do so vigorously during his fourth term as well, to ensure that the Israeli Supreme Court will continue to be renowned worldwide for its professionalism and its integrity,” he wrote.

Related Content

Haim Bibas
June 19, 2019
Haim Bibas: Build more shelters in North


Cookie Settings