Netanyahu to High Court: Let me get tycoon donations for legal defense

Netanyahu also asks justices to veto comptroller c'tee on need to return $300,000.

By
March 12, 2019 04:09
3 minute read.
PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu – if they go to trial, how will his corruption trials end?

PRIME MINISTER Benjamin Netanyahu – if they go to trial, how will his corruption trials end?. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu filed a petition with the High Court of Justice on Monday, asking for approval to receive donations from tycoons for his legal defense of an expected public corruption indictment.

Netanyahu asked the High Court to override a special State Comptroller committee ruling in February which prohibited him from receiving such funds and which had also ordered him to return $300,000 in donations he had received from his cousin and tycoon Natan Milikovsky without approval.

The committee’s February decision included a broader ruling that Netanyahu cannot receive donations from tycoons to fight the public corruption charges against him – which is why he must return the funds he received without approval.

At the time, Netanyahu said the decision was “unprecedented and harmed fundamental rights” that all citizens possess to finance defending themselves legally.

In his petition, he implied that he was being picked on by the committee because he was prime minister and wealthy.

He argued that just as poor people should not be undermined from making a full legal defense, powerful persons like himself should not be blocked from making such a defense, including by getting financial help that is given voluntarily.

On February 28, Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit announced an intent to indict Netanyahu for bribery in three different public corruption affairs.

It has been unclear what deadline there was for Netanyahu to return the $300,000, but the petition will likely push off that deadline regardless of the outcome.

Back in February, the Movement for the Quality of Government in Israel had sent a letter to Mandelblit demanding that he make Netanyahu return the funds within two weeks.

In other issues relating to Netanyahu’s legal problems, his defense lawyers have threatened to go to the High Court in the past, but had not actually followed up on the threat until now.

It is far from clear that the court would intervene to contradict the Comptroller’s Office on an issue regarding public corruption which appears to be firmly within its discretion.


In addition, the rejection came following a November 29 decision by the committee that had already rejected the prime minister’s request.

While Netanyahu’s legal team later claimed that it had new facts to share with the committee, the February decision indicated that the new facts rel
ating to the $300,000 already received merely made him vulnerable to having to return those funds.

The prime minister had received a preliminary sign-off by the Knesset for receiving the donations to his legal defense, but the state committee is the final authority on the issue.

Another aspect of February’s decision mentioned that Netanyahu and Milikovsky had joint business interests up until 2009, including Netanyahu’s early months as prime minister.

Furthermore, the decision connected Milikovsky indirectly to Thyssenkrupp and to David Shimron.

Thyssenkrupp is the German company wrapped up with Case 3000 –  the Submarines Affair – and Shimron, a lawyer and relative of both Netanyahu and Milikovsky, is suspected of facilitating bribery in the affair.

Though the prime minister is not a suspect in Case 3000, his spokesman issued a statement attacking the comptroller for mentioning Netanyahu and Milikovsky’s 10-year-old business interests. The statement called them irrelevant and deemed media reports trying to connect dots between Netanyahu and Case 3000 to be “fake news.”

To date, there has been no discussion of Netanyahu having committed a crime by receiving the $300,000, only that he must return the funds.

It is unclear what impact being blocked from receiving donations for his legal defense would have on Netanyahu’s posture toward the multiple public corruption cases he is facing if he does not succeed with the High Court petition.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

Druze people protest Trump's support for Israeli sovereignty over Golan Heights (REUTERS/Ammar Awad)
March 24, 2019
Druze protest Trump support for Israeli sovereignty over Golan Heights

By REUTERS