PM lawyers push to delay pre-indictment hearing, receive police evidence

After months of speculation, Mandelblit announced on February 28 his intent to indict Netanyahu for bribery, fraud and breach of trust.

By
April 10, 2019 21:31
2 minute read.
PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU consults with Avichai Mandelblit.

PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU consults with Avichai Mandelblit.. (photo credit: REUTERS)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s lawyers started to push for Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit to delay his pre-indictment hearing for a likely indictment for bribery and other charges beyond the currently scheduled July 10 date. In the meantime, Mandelblit’s office transferred the full police evidence on Wednesday to Netanyahu and other likely defendants in his public corruption cases.

Mandelblit’s office has not yet made a decision on whether it will delay the pre-indictment hearing beyond July 10, though there were reports that he might consider September.

The July 10 date was set by Mandelblit on March 11 as a compromise to honor Netanyahu’s request to delay transferring that evidence out of the prime minister’s fear that it would be used to embarrass him during the election season.

July 10 was picked based on the assumption that the evidence would be transferred to Netanyahu one day after elections and that his lawyers would have three months to review the documents.

The July 10 deadline would have given Netanyahu ample time to form a new government since the deadline for forming a coalition is May 30.

But having won the race for prime minister and with the complex work of forming a coalition before him, Netanyahu appears to believe he now has an advantage and that Mandelblit will find it hard to reject his request for a delay – regardless of the compromise which was reached a month ago.

After months of speculation, Mandelblit announced on February 28 his intent to indict Netanyahu for bribery, fraud and breach of trust in Case 4000, the Bezeq-Walla affair; for breach of trust in Case 1000, the Illegal Gifts affair; and for breach of trust in Case 2000, the Yediot Aharonot-Israel Hayom affair.

Regardless that Netanyahu was reelected, there is a strong chance that Mandelblit, after holding the series of pre-indictment hearings with Netanyahu’s lawyers, will issue a final decision to indict him in the next six to 12 months. This could lead the High Court to force the prime minister’s resignation if he does not voluntarily step down.

Sources close to Mandelblit have previously told The Jerusalem Post that if the attorney-general moved to indict Netanyahu for the serious charge of bribery – as opposed to a lesser charge – he would not defend Netanyahu before the High Court if a petition were filed to force the prime minister to resign.

Separately, it is expected that, with the elections concluded, Mandelblit will order the police to proceed more actively in probing the new evidence that arose about Netanyahu during the elections relating to Case 3000, the Submarine affair.

While Mandelblit felt it would have been unfair to proceed with the initial review during elections season, that is no longer an issue. Given that he is already moving toward indicting Netanyahu in three other cases, the attorney-general is not expected to permit the police to question Netanyahu under caution unless they find serious potential criminal conduct comparable to Case 4000.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

FROM LEFT: Michael Siegal, Jewish Agency chairman of the board; Owen Egre, 10,000th Onward Israel pa
June 26, 2019
Surge in Diaspora young professionals in Israeli programs

By ALAN ROSENBAUM

Cookie Settings