AG closes case against Herzog based on insufficient evidence; Likely to indict Herzog's top aide

Attorney-General Mandelblit closed the corruption case against opposition leader Herzog citing insufficient evidence.

By
January 30, 2017 18:42
2 minute read.
Isaac Herzog

Isaac Herzog. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit on Monday night closed the corruption case against opposition leader Isaac Herzog without indictment on the basis of insufficient evidence.

Allegations had been made that Herzog accepted illegal contributions during the 2013 Labor primaries, failed to report the contributions and filed a false declaration regarding them.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Mandelblit’s assessment was not a resounding affirmation of Herzog’s innocence. He even expressed doubt about aspects of his narrative, but said there was insufficient proof to thoroughly disprove Herzog’s alibi of ignorance of illegal conduct by aides and supporters, and certainly not enough proof to show criminal intent.

Herzog was questioned under caution multiple times about alleged campaign fund-raising violations in April, but after questioning, the police recommended closing the case.

In late March, Mandelblit initiated an initial probe into alleged fund-raising violations by Herzog in his 2013 campaign for the Labor Party leadership against incumbent Shelly Yacimovich.

Herzog has said that he only knew about his positive campaign, but not about a separate negative campaign against Yacimovich.

Mandelblit said there was evidence that Herzog knew about the negative campaign, but not necessarily all its details and not to the level of criminal intent about any illegal transfers.



“I praise the attorney-general’s decision that listened to all police and attorneys’ advice, to shut down the investigation case against me,” said Herzog.

“I have always believed that it would be proven that I acted according to the law and I am happy it happened already in this stage. It should be said that this investigation was based on a biased and baseless article that was published on the eve of the general elections in 2015, in the Israel Hayom newspaper. I am certain that the same will happen also with the others that are involved in the case.”

At the same time, Mandelblit said – subject to a pre-indictment hearing – he will likely indict Herzog’s 2013 election campaign chief Shimon Batat as well as Gilad Ramot, who allegedly transferred funds illegally to Herzog’s campaign, .

According to Mandelblit, Batat requested that lawyer Daniel Cohen conduct a negative campaign against Yacimovich for a fee of NIS 40,000 and coordinated with Ramot to pay with eight checks of NIS 5,000 each.

Ramot’s company opposed a reform under consideration by the Knesset, which Herzog lined up to oppose. The overall allegation was that Herzog and Batat used their political power to help Ramot’s business in exchange for his funding a negative campaign against Yacomovich – funding which was never reported to the state comptroller.

While Batat and Ramot said Cohen performed other services for them, Cohen rejected their stories and said Batat hired him to attack Yacimovich with funds provided by Ramot.

It is expected that Batat and Ramot will be indicted based on those contradictions, whereas there was not enough proof of Herzog having sufficient direct contact with any of the parties – specifically about the illegal funds – to prove he knew about the funds or opposed the reform in order to help Ramot in exchange for them.

Udi Shaham and Gil Hoffman contributed to this story.

Related Content

epipen
July 18, 2018
Knesset passes EpiPen law

By OREN OPPENHEIM