Hayut maneuvers PM into postponing vote on limiting High Court as price for meeting

The Supreme Court Justice and prime minister sparred off.

April 23, 2018 22:30
1 minute read.
Hayut maneuvers PM into postponing vote on limiting High Court as price for meeting

Esther Hayut. (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


Supreme Court President Esther Hayut stared down Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday into pushing off a scheduled cabinet meeting vote on limiting the court’s powers as a price to meet with her to discuss the issue.

Netanyahu asked Hayut for a meeting about the issue after Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit said his support for any change was conditional on a negotiated process with the judicial branch fully involved.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

But Hayut replied she would only meet with him if he pushed off the meeting – appearing to view the meeting as a metaphorical gun to the head of the judicial branch.

The Likud and Bayit Yehudi parties fought over the significance of the postponed vote and whether it showed a fear of conflict with Hayut.

Previously, at least portions of the coalition were pushing for a bill which allowed the Knesset to override the Supreme Court with a vote of only 60 MKs whereas Mandelblit would oppose any bill that required a vote of less than 70 MKs.

Hayut is believed to want no bill or a vote of 80 MKs, but might be willing to come down from that number – though not to 60 MKs.

Former justice Elyakim Rubinstein has previously told The Jerusalem Post he would support such a bill with a vote of 70 MKs like Mandelblit.


The general move for a Knesset veto comes against the backdrop of the government wanting to carry out an African migrant policy, which might violate the court’s limits on deportation or detention as well as years of frustration on the Right at previous court interventions.

Various justices and liberal legal scholars have generally said they would support a Knesset veto of the court in the context in which the Knesset also adopts a constitution which would protect the rule of law and minority rights.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

The car in which MK Moshe Gafni was injured, September 17, 2018
September 18, 2018
Haredi MK Gafni nearly lynched on Yom Kippur eve for support of draft bill