Naor: Consider sending ‘third home tax’ law back to legislature

Knesset admits accelerated passage was problematic.

May 9, 2017 20:00
2 minute read.
Miriam Naor

Miriam Naor. (photo credit: MARC ISRAEL SELLEM)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


The High Court of Justice suggested that the Knesset bring back to its committees a law levying a tax on people who own three or more homes, in a hearing Tuesday on the way it was passed.

It’s unclear that the law, which was controversial even within the coalition, will have a majority supporting it a second time.

Opposition leader Isaac Herzog (Zionist Union) petitioned the High Court against the law, saying there was a “fundamental flaw in the legislative process,” in that it was passed too quickly, without enough discussion, in December. He called for the law to be canceled, as opposed to the current court order delaying its implementation.

The government responded to the petition saying that there was no problem with the legislative process, but, in an unusual move, Knesset Legal Adviser Eyal Yinon said there was “a defect that goes to the root of the procedure, which, on principle, justifies the cancellation of the law.”

However, Yinon asked the court to consider sending the bill back to the Knesset Finance Committee to pick up the legislative process in the middle, as though it had passed a first reading already.

During court proceedings, Supreme Court President Miriam Naor asked Yinon what the considerations against bringing the bill back to the Finance Committee would be.

“It could be that it is a step to consider in cases of extreme abnormalities in the legislative process, so it should be brought back to where the flaw happened in a significant constitutional matter,” Yinon said. “Some would say that is canceling the law.”

Justice Menachem Mazuz berated Yinon, saying: “Instead of the Knesset dealing with its own problems, it comes to cry to the court and says, ‘Save us from ourselves.’ The question is whether the Knesset will fix its rules of order or regulate the legislative process.”

Yinon said that although he agrees theoretically, MKs write the rules of order.

The High Court asked the government to respond by Sunday to the suggestion of bringing the bill back to the Finance Committee, and then a second and third (final) reading in the Knesset’s plenum.

Justice Ministry representative Shosh Shmueli said doing so “will create a mess, because there are people who asked to get the grant for those who sell [their third] home... This isn’t an alternative.”

Naor told Shmueli that the advantage of Yinon’s suggestion was that they could avoid restarting the process. “It’s like taking an apple that has a rotten bit, taking it out and eating the rest of the apple,” Naor said.

After the court adjourned for the day, Herzog saw the proceedings as a victory for the opposition. “It would be good if the state accepted the High Court’s recommendation... to bring the bill back for a new debate and legislate it according to the appropriate legislative procedure,” he said.

“The battle is not about one law or another, but about democracy and the rights of citizens that are being trampled, while harming the status of the Knesset and MKs’ job to oversee legislative procedures that are meant to protect the citizens of Israel.”

Related Content

Leonardo DiCaprio
June 17, 2019
Leonardo DiCaprio to testify in favor of Bar Refaeli?


Cookie Settings