Rabbis in conflict over whether to kill wounded terrorists

Rabbis Eliyahu and Mutzafi rule terrorists should be killed at scene of attack, Rabbis Stav and Ariel rule not to harm assailants if incapacitated.

By
October 15, 2015 15:16
2 minute read.
guela attack

Scene of the ramming and stabbing attack in the ultra-Orthodox neighborhood of Guela in Jeruslaem October 13, 2015. (photo credit: GIL COHEN MAGEN / AFP)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For a symbolic $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Don't show it again

Several senior rabbis have raised a heated debate over the approach in Jewish law toward a terrorist who has committed murder, but is subsequently injured and incapacitated.

A terrorist who has been injured and no longer poses immediate danger should not be further harmed after committing a murderous attack– even when the nation is facing trying and difficult times, insisted prominent national-religious chairman of the Tzohar rabbinical association, Rabbi David Stav, earlier this week.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


“In these days in which the blood is boiling... it is important to preserve our moral superiority; [we must] not harm those involved in murderous acts who have already been neutralized and do not represent a threat,” he ruled.

Safed Chief Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, reacting to Stav’s comments, said that a terrorist who had committed murder should be killed.

“It is forbidden to leave a murderer alive,” Eliyahu told the Galei Yisrael radio station on Wednesday. He accused Tzohar rabbis of “forgetting Jewish law” because “they are only interested in looking good to non-Jews.”

Continued Eliyahu, “Jewish law is clear... there are courts that can avenge blood and there are individuals who can avenge blood. This is Jewish law: If the court does not avenge the blood, then an individual can avenge the blood.”

To “avenge blood” is a concept in Jewish law relating to the punishment for murder and manslaughter.



“We can’t be consumed all day with what others are thinking about us,” the rabbi concluded.

Rabbi Ben-Tzion Mutzafi, another senior rabbinical figure and prominent haredi arbiter of Jewish law, was also fiercely critical of Stav’s approach.

According to the Srugim news website, Mutzafi was asked by his students whether, if a terrorist has been injured and incapacitated, it is permitted according to Jewish law to kill him.

“It is commanded to take hold of his head and hit it against the ground until there is no longer any life in it,” Mutzafi responded.

“Do not listen to Stav, for the one who is merciful to the cruel will end up being cruel to the merciful,” he added.

Ramat Gan Chief Rabbi Yaakov Ariel, one of the most senior national-religious leaders, also waded into the debate.

Asked on the yeshiva.org website about the differing opinions voiced by the rabbis on the issue, Ariel backed Stav’s initial comments, replying that only when the terrorist still presents a danger is it permitted to kill him.

“If the danger has passed and the terrorist is restrained or injured, [people] must act wisely, judiciously and not through spontaneous emotion,” ruled Ariel.

“The commandment to avenge blood is a major commandment in Islam; there is no need to add fuel to the fire.

Death does not necessarily deter, since the one killed is typically portrayed as a shahid [martyr]. It needs to be evaluated with security experts.”


Related Content

Castro clothing store, Israel
June 25, 2018
Israeli clothing chain Castro buys up Hoodies

By MAX SCHINDLER