Supreme Court prevents use of dead soldier’s sperm

The soldier's widow and parents were at odds about the decision.

By
April 4, 2017 18:48
1 minute read.
Israel

Supreme Court of Israel. (photo credit: Wikimedia Commons)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the parents of a fallen soldier to allow his frozen sperm to be used to father children via a surrogate mother.

Capt. Shaked Meiri died in 2004 in a military accident in the Golan Heights while on reserve army duty.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


Immediately after the accident, some of his sperm was extracted in the event that there was a desire to use it at a later date.

However, Meiri’s widow ultimately decided she did not want to have child through her late husband’s sperm, and after herself remarrying and establishing a family with her second husband refused to allow Shaked’s sperm to be used to father children via a different surrogate as requested by his parents.

Although lower court rulings found in favor of the parents, an appeal by the widow to the Supreme Court was upheld in December, while the court rejected an appeal by Shaked’s parents to reexamine the case in front of an enlarged panel of justices on Monday.

Rabbi Yuval Cherlow, head of the Ethics Department of the Tzohar rabbinical association, gave his backing to the Supreme Court ruling.

“It is heartbreaking, but the Supreme Court was correct in its ruling,” the rabbi argued. “When a man forges a covenant with his wife and his wife with him, this covenant precedes any other. This ethos is written in the account of creation when it says, ‘A man will leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife and they will become one flesh,’ and this is the appropriate ethical approach.”

Related Content

Basketball
July 20, 2018
Latest Israeli hoops protégé Deni Avdija finding his wings

By JOSHUA HALICKMAN