Coalition to decide fate of bills constraining Arab MKs

Any one of the six parties in the coalition will have veto power.

By DAN IZENBERG
June 7, 2010 06:27
2 minute read.
Coalition to decide fate of bills constraining Arab MKs

zeev elkin 88. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Any one of the six parties in the coalition will have the power to veto two private member’s bills calling to stiffen constraints on the actions of Arab MKs, after the Ministerial Committee for Legislation on Sunday passed the bills on to parliamentary coalition head Ze’ev Elkin (Likud).

Elkin faces the hurdle of persuading the Labor Party to support the proposals, both of which would amend the Basic Law: The Knesset. According to the coalition agreement, every coalition party has the right to veto any changes to the constitutional status quo.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The first bill, submitted by Likud MK Danny Danon, states that if at least 30 MKs are of the opinion that a parliamentary colleague has violated Article 7a of the Basic Law: The Knesset, it may present a motion to the Knesset speaker asking for the MK’s dismissal. If at least 80 MKs support the motion, the MK will be ousted from the Knesset.

According to Article 7a, an MK may be fired if “the goals or actions of the person, expressly or by implication, include one of the following: 1. Negation of the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state; 2. Incitement to racism; 3. Support for armed struggle by a hostile state or a terrorist organization against the State of Israel.”

The MK whose ouster is demanded may appeal the motion to the Knesset House Committee. If the committee rejects the motion, it will be dropped before the plenum has the chance to vote on it.

The second bill, submitted by Israel Beiteinu MKs David Rotem and Robert Ilatov, calls for MKs to swear allegiance to the State of Israel as a “Jewish, Zionist and democratic state, to its values and symbols.”


Asked whether Rotem did not believe that he was making it impossible for Arab MKs to take the oath, his spokesman said that this was the state that was created in 1948 and that the Declaration of Independence made these same statements.



“The labor parties – Mapai, Ahdut Ha’avoda and Mapam – established the state on these principles,” said the spokesman. “We grew up on them.”

The committee also endorsed a private member’s bill filed by Rotem after three ministers demanded a revote at Sunday’s meeting. The bill calls to provide benefits to those who have served two full years in the army or two full years in national service. The benefits include higher education tuition fee payments of up to NIS 9,350 a year for three years and an extra 10 percent in credit points for mortgages over and above the points otherwise accumulated. Those eligible under the legislation would also be allotted 25% of all plots of land or apartments made available by government tender.

In another development, the committee rejected a bill submitted by United Torah Judaism MKs Moshe Gafni and Uri Maklev which would have extended the powers of the rabbinical courts by allowing them to deal with civil matters if both parties agreed to the move.

Under the existing law, rabbinical courts may only deal with marriage and divorce issues.

Women’s organizations, including the Rackman Center for the Advancement of the Status of Women, strongly opposed the bill because they feared that weaker parties, particularly women, would be forced to accept rabbinical court adjudication even though it was allegedly against their best interests.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN