Court debates removing Yigal Amir from confinement

State considers moving Rabin assassin to coupled segregation; Shin Bet opposes, says he poses risk of ideological indoctrination to inmates.

By JPOST.COM STAFF
November 15, 2010 12:15
1 minute read.
Rabin assassin Yigal Amir in court

311_yigal amir in court [file]. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

The Supreme Court on Monday debated over the appeal of Yitzhak Rabin assassin Yigal Amir to be removed from solitary confinement for the coming year.

During the debate, the state said it was willing to transfer Amir to coupled segregation, in which another prisoner would join Amir in a cell. However, Amir's attorney said he rejected the idea.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


RELATED:
Rights group calls for Yigal Amir's release from isolation
Yigal Amir asks to be taken out of solitary confinement

In response to the argument in which officials believe Amir may indoctrinate others once he comes out of solitary confinement, Amir said "I had no intention to indoctrinate and I have no I idea what indoctrination is being referred to."

Differences between the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) and the attorney general were visible during the hearing. The Shin Bet's position is that Amir should remain in solitary confinement due to the ideological risk he poses and the impact that may have on other inmates.

Amir's wife, Larissa Trimbobler, said before the hearing that "conditions which Amir is being held in are considered torture in other places of the world. The state wants to torture him. The Shin Bet claims that he has a dangerous ideology? He has no such ideology," Trimbobler said. "The time has come to remove him from solitary confinement in which he is being held."

Amir appealed to the Supreme Court to be removed from solitary confinement in the Rimonim Prison. "I am interested in integrating into the ultra-Orthodox wing so that I will be able to pray and be in the company of other people," he claimed in his petition.

Last week, relying on the Shin Bet's position, the Israel Prison Service opposed Amir's appeal and claimed that he has the motivation to spread his extremist indoctrination to an audience and those that are close to him. They also feared that there is a risk that other inmates may try to harm Amir as revenge for the assassination of Rabin.

Related Content

Jisr az-Zarq
April 3, 2014
Residents of Jisr az-Zarqa beckon Israel Trail hikers to enjoy their town

By SHARON UDASIN