picture from the parasha 521.
(photo credit: Yoram Raanan)
The Bible believes in the significance of dreams; so did the Sages of the Talmud
(B.T. Brachot, chapter 9), so did Shakespeare and so did Sigmund Freud.
Shakespeare declared that “We are such stuff as dreams are made on” (The Tempest
4:1) – that the thoughts and emotions of the human being provide the raw
material for the dreams he experiences in his sleep at night. Conversely, Freud
taught that the best code to unlocking the mystery of an individual’s
personality is by studying the symbolism of his dreams.
Hence when Joseph
heard that the imprisoned cupbearer is dreaming of serving wine to Pharaoh once
again, he understood that this man did not have a guilty conscience and, in all
likelihood, Pharaoh’s investigation would find him innocent; the cupbearer would
be freed and reinstated. The baker, on the other hand, dreamed that birds
were eating the baked goods from a basket he was carrying on his head. One who
paranoically believes that others are robbing him of the food he has prepared
for Pharaoh obviously feels that he was derelict in his duties and worthy of
being punished. Joseph knew that the baker would be found guilty…
the Sages of the Talmud utilize this dream of the cupbearer as the source for
one of the primary activities of our Passover Seder, and, in so doing, reveal a
great truth about the personality of Joseph as well as about the political
significance of our Exodus from Egypt. In Chapter 10 of the Jerusalem Talmud
Pessahim, Rabbi Yohanan suggests that the four cups of wine that punctuate the
Seder and enhance our Festival of Freedom hark back to the four references to
“cups” of wine in the cupbearer’s dream – rather than to the four expressions of
redemption in Exodus (6:6-8) as brought down in the Babylonian Talmud Pessahim.
(Those who are familiar with my Commentary on the Haggadah will note that there
is a fifth time when “cup” is mentioned in Genesis paralleling the fifth
expression of redemption in Exodus.)
What would cause the Jerusalem Talmud to
prefer a source from the period of Joseph over a seminal Divine prophecy that
foretold the Exodus? Firstly, the cupbearer’s dream relates specifically to
goblets of wine, the precise objects with which we are dealing in the Seder.
Halachically speaking, Rabbi Haim Brisker maintains that the cup, or goblet, is
very significant; one must not only drink the majority of a revi’it of wine (3.3
ounces) with each blessing over the wine, but one must drink a majority of the
cup from which one is drinking, no matter how large it is. Remember that wine
not only helps one feel joyous, but it also makes one feel
Moreover, the cupbearer had been wrongfully imprisoned (enslaved)
by Pharaoh, and was then exonerated and freed, perfectly paralleling the
situation of the Hebrews at the time of the Exodus. Herein lies a great lesson,
which might have been overlooked had we only had the source from the Book of
The four expressions of redemption apply specifically to the
Israelites – which might have led us to believe that the significance of the
Exodus related only to God’s special love for Israel. Linking the four cups of
freedom to the Egyptian cupbearer reminds us that God wants every human being to
be free – because every human being is created in the image of the Divine, is
equal to every other human being, and no human dare enslave his
brother. Joseph is the true universalist among the tribes. He initially
dreams of sheaves of grain, Egyptian agriculture, and he wishes to influence the
entire cosmos, the sun, the moon and the stars.
principle of a free humanity is a meta-Halacha (meta-Jewish law) which must
govern human affairs. At the Song of the Re(e)d Sea, all the nations – Edom,
Moab, Canaan – are pictured as submitting to the power of the one God of the
Universe, who alone must rule the world (Exodus 15:14-18). The American
Revolutionaries got it right: “Rebellion against tyranny is obedience to God.”
Would that the president of the United States today led the United Nations in
that direction vis-à-vis Syria and Iran.
For Maimonides (Rambam), this
must be the basis of our Oral Law as we interpret the Torah for each generation.
Yes, says the Rambam, the law in the past did allow us to treat the gentile
slave with “rigor,” but this must not be the attitude of any Jew now. He cites
the Book of Job, wherein God says to the master who is inconsiderate to his
slave, “was it not the one God who formed both master and slave in His womb?”
(31:13-16). Maimonides in effect abolishes slavery (see the last law in his Laws
And this fundamental human right to be free causes Maimonides
to reinterpret the simple meaning of the Bible to enable the woman imprisoned in
an insufferable marriage to be freed. “Our wives are not to be treated as
captives under the control of their husbands,” he declares (Laws of Matrimony
14: 8). Would that legal decisors took Maimonides’s words to heart and mind.