Two Jewish groups back patient autonomy

Two Jewish groups back p

By JTA
September 22, 2009 10:04

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Two Orthodox Jewish organizations filed a brief in the case of a brain-dead man whose family wanted to keep him on life support despite doctors' wishes. Agudath Israel of America and the Rabbinical Council of America filed an amicus brief Monday that laid out the case for patient autonomy. The Jewish groups' brief cites numerous cases in New Jersey and elsewhere in which courts ruled that patients and their families have the right to refuse life-sustaining medical care despite objections from the patient's health care providers. The brief alleges that in effect, the hospital is asserting that patients have a right to choose to die but not to live. The man, Ruben Betancourt, 73, suffered oxygen deprivation during surgery in March and was declared to be in a persistent vegetative state. His daughter wanted to keep her father on life support, but doctors claimed that they alone should have the final right to decide when a patient is meaningfully alive and when to cease life-sustaining measures. The New Jersey Superior Court determined that Betancourt's daughter had the right to decide her father's care, a decision the hospital appealed. Betancourt died before the appeal was heard.

Related Content

Joan Rivers
August 28, 2014
Joan Rivers rushed to hospital following throat surgery

By JPOST.COM STAFF