Judge urges clarity for unmarried couples

By MIRIAM BULWAR DAVID-HAY (TRANSLATED)
March 18, 2009 15:03

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

A Haifa District Court judge is making waves by declaring that the term "yeduim ba'tsibur" ("publicly known") to denote unmarried couples who live together is archaic and should be replaced, reports www.mynet.co.il. Judge Yael Vilner said the term "shutafut zugit," or "joint partnership" would better reflect the real relationship of such couples and their status under the law. According to the report, the judge made her comments while ruling on a case in which a woman claimed that a man was her "yadua ba'tsibur" de facto husband and that after he died she was entitled to inherit his property. The man's children claimed, however, that the pair were not a couple and the woman was merely their father's care-giver and not entitled to inherit from him. The local Court for Family Matters ruled in the children's favor, but the woman appealed to the District Court. Judge Vilner overturned the lower court's decision and ruled in the woman's favor, saying that the time had come to replace the concept with a term that would better reflect the intentions and real relationship of a couple and indicate their legal status.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

JERUSALEM: RESETTLED upon its desolation
December 19, 2010
Vying for control of the Temple Mount – on Foursquare

By SHARON UDASIN