Demand for inquiry into stadium failures

By MIRIAM BULWAR DAVID-HAY (TRANSLATED)
April 23, 2009 14:55
1 minute read.

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user uxperience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew, Ivrit
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Repor
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Netanya council's opposition leader, Herzl Keren, is demanding that a public committee be set up to examine the city's and the building contractor's alleged failures in constructing a municipal sports stadium, reports www.local.co.il. Keren said that large sums of money were involved in the project and the public was entitled to "clear answers" as to what had occurred over the past three years to delay the work so badly. According to the report, Keren said that according to the contract between the city and the Ramet construction company, the stadium was supposed to have been completed by July 2008. But only one-third had been built until now, and even in the best possible scenario there was "no chance" that the stadium would be inaugurated before 2011. Keren said that both city officials and the building contractor had "failed the test of results" and had not met the construction schedule detailed in the contract. Keren also said that at a city council meeting to discuss the issue last month, Mayor Miriam Fierberg-Ikar and the councilor in charge of the project, Eli Dallal, had tried to "explain and excuse" why the city and the contractor had not met the schedule, and why the city was not guilty of any neglect and did not need to have any public committee examine the problems in the stadium's construction. "Those involved in the failure are not able and not entitled to examine themselves," Keren said. Keren said the issue had to be examined and a public committee should be set up to do so, made up of two coalition councilors and one opposition councilor who would present their findings to the council within 90 days. "Because we are speaking about a public project and especially about public funds, it is the right of the public to know what occurred during the course of the last three years around the building of the stadium and who is responsible for the fact that the stadium has not been built in accordance with the schedule fixed in the contract," Keren said. No response to the demand was reported.

Related Content

JERUSALEM: RESETTLED upon its desolation
December 19, 2010
Vying for control of the Temple Mount – on Foursquare

By SHARON UDASIN