Hagel: US believes Syrian gov't used chemical arms

US secretary of defense says US intel community believes sarin gas used on small scale by Assad, but White House cautious.

By REUTERS
April 25, 2013 23:23
3 minute read.
Chuck Hagel speaks in Islamabad, April 13, 2006

Chuck Hagel speaks in Islamabad 370. (photo credit: REUTERS/Mian Kursheed)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – US intelligence agencies believe Syria’s government has likely used chemical weapons on a small scale, the White House said on Thursday, but added that President Barack Obama needed “credible and corroborated” facts before acting on that assessment.

The disclosure of the assessment, which Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said was made within the past 24 hours and the White House said was based in part on physiological samples, triggered immediate calls for US action by members of Congress who advocate deeper US involvement.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


The Prime Minister’s Office had no comment on Hagel’s statement that chemical weapons were used in Syria.

The defense secretary’s admission came two days after Brig.-Gen. Itai Brun, head of Military Intelligence’s Research Division, said, “We believe the regime has, and is using, chemical weapons” – probably sarin – against rebels trying to overthrow Assad, and that it has done so several times.

The Prime Minister’s Office also refused to relate to those comments, apparently out of a desire to avoid a conflict with the US administration over the matter. Obama has said that Assad’s use of chemical weapons would constitute a “red line” that would trigger an American response.

But while Obama declared that Syrian use of chemical weapons would be a gamechanger, his administration made clear it would move carefully – mindful of the lessons of the start of the Iraq War 10 years ago.

Then, the George W. Bush administration used faulty intelligence to justify the Iraq invasion in pursuit of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons that turned out not to exist.

JPOST VIDEOS THAT MIGHT INTEREST YOU:


“Given the stakes involved, and what we have learned from our own recent experiences, intelligence assessmentscredible and corroborated facts that provide us with some degree of certainty will guide our decision-making,” Miguel Rodriguez, White House director of the office of legislative affairs, said in a letter to lawmakers.

One senior US defense official told reporters that “we have seen very bad movies before” where intelligence was perceived to have driven policy decisions that later, in the cold light of day, were proven wrong.

The White House said the US intelligence community assessed with varying degrees of confidence that the chemical agent sarin was used by the Syrian government. But it noted that “the chain of custody is not clear.”

“So we cannot confirm how the exposure occurred and under what conditions,” according to the White House letter, sent to lawmakers.

The term “varying degrees of confidence” also usually suggested debate within the intelligence community about the assessment, the defense official noted.

The scale of the sarin use appeared limited, with one US intelligence official noting that nobody was “seeing any mass casualties” from any Syrian chemical weapons use.

France, Britain and Israel have concluded that evidence suggests chemical arms have been used in Syria’s conflict.

Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, one of the leading advocates of deeper US involvement in Syria’s civil war, said the US intelligence assessment demanded Washington follow with action.

“The president of the United States said that if Bashar Assad used chemical weapons, it would be a game changer, that it would cross a red line,” he said.

“I think it’s pretty obvious that red line has been crossed.”

Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said there was likely still a need to check on chemical weapons use.

“There realistically is probably some additional steps that need to be taken to verify, but... there are indications a red line has been crossed,” Corker told reporters.

Click for full JPost coverage

Syria’s deputy foreign minister, Faisal Mekdad, told Reuters that US aid to the rebels may backfire and lead to attacks on American soil like those of September 11, 2001.

“Once the fire of terrorism spreads in Syria it will go everywhere in the world,” he said in an interview in Damascus.

The White House has not specified what action Obama might take if he determines with certainty that Syria has used chemical weapons. But in its letter to lawmakers, it said it was “prepared for all contingencies.”

Herb Keinon contributed to this report.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

File: Jordan's King Abdullah II greets Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu at the White House in Washin
October 22, 2018
Is Israel’s position in region as secure as it looks?

By SETH J. FRANTZMAN