Mixed messages from Jerusalem

Mixed messages from Jeru

December 8, 2009 02:45
1 minute read.
assad sarkozy here kitty kitty 248.88 AP

assad sarkozy here kitty kitty 248.88 AP. (photo credit: AP [file[)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


One would think there would be a single answer coming out of Jerusalem regarding whom Israel preferred to mediate future indirect talks with Syria - France or Turkey. But one would be mistaken. Within the span of 18 hours on Sunday and Monday, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu gave diametrically different answers to the question of whether Israel preferred French or Turkish mediation. Ayalon met Sunday with a delegation of leading journalists and academics brought over by the American Jewish Committee, and said - according to a statement he released - "relations between the two nations were back on track and as good as ever despite the recent harsh rhetoric." Israel's ties with Turkey, which mediated indirect talks with Syria in 2008, nosedived following extremely harsh criticism over the last year coming from Ankara. Ayalon called on the Syrians to meet Israel face to face and without third party mediation. "We appreciate Turkish efforts and the previous talks did not fail because of Turkey, but rather because of Syrian intransigence," he said. "However, if in the future we make progress with the Syrians and we will seek assistance from a third party, Turkey will be the first nation we will turn to," he said. So there it is, Israel prefers Turkey …or not. Netanyahu, whose word carries a bit more weight in this matter than Ayalon's, met the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Monday and made clear that he preferred the French connection. He said he told French President Nicolas Sarkozy as much when he met him in Paris last month. "I spoke to Sarkozy, who told me that Turkey's position was a withdrawal to the 1967 lines," Netanyahu said. "Sarkozy also spoke about the Turkish mediation, which the Syrians were suggesting. "I replied that we are interested in direct negotiations, and that if we were already discussing a mediator, I would prefer them [the French]." So who is it, Turkey or France? Ayalon, asked by The Jerusalem Post to explain the contradictory comments on Monday, said "First of all we want to emphasize that there is no substitute for direct talks. There could be a point where we need assistance, and we could try to bring in any number of countries: Turkey, France or the US. It all depends on the circumstances at the time." Clear?

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

November 12, 2018
Can Saudi Arabia compete as Iran flexes its economic muscles in Iraq?