Nasrallah recalls ’97 Shayetet to 'deflect pressure'

Strife caused by tribunal allegations would undermine Iranian designs for regional war, says Israeli analyst.

By
August 11, 2010 04:32
3 minute read.
HIZBULLAH LEADER Sheik Hassan Nasrallah is seen on a screen during a news conference held in Beirut’

Nasrallah 311. (photo credit: Bilal Hussein/AP)

 
X

Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

Hizbullah chief Hassan Nasrallah revisited the 1997 navy commando disaster, in which 12 IDF soldiers were killed by explosives while on a mission in Lebanon, during a televised speech on Monday evening.

The commandos stepped on explosives planted by Hizbullah, leading to the high number of casualties in the early morning hours of September 5, 1997, in Ansariya.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.


During his speech, Nasrallah said his organization knew of the position of the commandos in advance thanks to the interception of unencrypted video footage broadcast by Israeli drones that were hovering over the area in the days before the mission.

“We knew in advance, and prepared the ambush... the spy planes hovered and sent live pictures to a control room in occupied Palestine. The brothers accessed this broadcast and the pictures arrived in a control room of the resistance [Hizbullah],” Nasrallah said, according to an Army Radio translation of his speech.

Nasrallah also presented additional footage during his address, which he claimed was intercepted from Israeli UAVs, and attempted to present them as evidence of Israeli preparations to kill former Lebanese prime minister Rafiq Hariri in 2005.

Claims that Hizbullah intercepted classified footage, leading to the deadly attack on the commandos, have appeared before. In 2003, Nasrallah’s deputy, Naim Qassem, made similar claims in a book he published.

“Clearly, he’s under pressure from the [UN’s] Special Tribunal for Lebanon,” said Ely Karmon, a senior scholar at the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center’s Institute for Counter-Terrorism.



A Lebanese civil war caused by the tribunal would upset Iranian designs to use Hizbullah to provoke Israel and create a major regional conflict, thereby diverting attention away from Teheran’s nuclear program, Karmon told The Jerusalem Post.

“I believe Iran is planning a provocation that is designed to cause a regional war, without participating in it directly. A conflict sparked by the international tribunal would be based on an anti-Hizbullah development, and could undermine the whole region. This would upset Iran’s plans. If the Tribunal accuses Hizbullah of Hariri’s murder, and this leads to a civil war in Lebanon, this would not suit Iran and Hizbullah,” he said.

“Nasrallah is trying to build up a case and sell it to the Lebanese public.

This is a show for domestic consumption. He is scared of a civil war,” Karmon added.

Nasrallah’s comments also sparked a lively exchange on Army Radio on Monday morning. Amir Raparport, a senior military correspondent and a researcher for the Begin Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University, told Army Radio that Nasrallah’s account of what took place during the mission was largely accurate, though some details were exaggerated.

“The technology for encrypting broadcasts already existed [in 1997], but UAVs that had those abilities were reserved for the Sayeret Matkal unit, which is part of the Army’s Military Intelligence Directorate,” he said.

“Encryption capabilities were not available to the navy commandos because of a lack of coordination...

Hizbullah was able to draw conclusions from the intercepted images... and plant explosives in the area,” Rapaport said.


Maj.-Gen. (res.) Yaakov Amidror, former head of the IDF’s Research and Assessment Division, who was military secretary to former defense minister Yitzhak Mordechai in 1997, disputed Rapaport’s comments, saying, “Every new capability enters the army in this way. It is invested where it is most needed. Then, it is made available to others.

“The State of Israel is not wealthy enough to give everything to everyone,” he said.

Addressing Hizbullah’s position in Lebanon, Amidror said, “Nasrallah’s problem is that he knows that his people killed Hariri. He knows that the tribunal knows. He gave the orders... Hence, he is worried... and now he has to lie.”

Related Content

A general view of Kabul January 31, 2010.
August 17, 2018
Afghan president congratulates armed forces for Ghazni victory

By REUTERS