Russia's Putin hopeful, but not 100% sure Syrian chemical arms deal will succeed

President reiterates suspicion that rebels carried out Aug. 21 attack.

September 19, 2013 17:43
2 minute read.
Russian President Vladimir Putin

Russian president Putin370. (photo credit: reuters)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analyses from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief

UPGRADE YOUR JPOST EXPERIENCE FOR 5$ PER MONTH Show me later Don't show it again

VALDAI, Russia - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday he could not be 100 percent certain a plan for the destruction of Syrian chemical arms would be carried out successfully but he saw reason to hope it would.

Putin, whose country has been the Syrian government's main ally in the more than two-year-old civil war, praised US President Barack Obama for not carrying out threats of a military strike over a poison gas attack in rebel-held areas.

Be the first to know - Join our Facebook page.

He said such a strike would violate international law and reiterated suspicions that Assad's opponents had staged the attack, which killed hundreds of people on Aug. 21, to encourage military action by the United States.

"Will we be able to accomplish it all (the destruction of Syria's chemical arms)? I cannot be 100 percent sure about it," Putin told a gathering of journalists and Russia experts.

"But everything we have seen so far in recent days gives us confidence that this will happen ... I hope so."

Crisis in Syria - full coverage

The former KGB spy said the "primitive" make of the warhead used for the attack provided strong grounds to believe it was staged by Assad's foes and that other alleged chemical weapons attacks in Syria also needed to be investigated. Washington says it believes the attack was carried out by Assad's forces.

"We always talk about the responsibility of the Assad government, if he was the one who used it (a chemical weapon). What if the opposition used it?," Putin said. "We have every reason to believe it was a cunning provocation."

Russia and the United States brokered a deal on Saturday to put Assad's chemical arms stockpiles under international control to avoid possible US military strikes that Washington said would be intended to punish him over the gas attack.

Such a strike, Putin warned, "would be a strike on world order, not on Syria."

He complained that the threat of military action held out by Washington and other Western allies was poorly thought through and could have the unintended consequence of helping al-Qaida militants come to power.

"His (Obama's) decision was based on a real analysis of the situation, and I am very happy that our positions matched on this issue," he said.

"The United States has admitted that al-Qaida is fighting there. When I speak to my colleagues, I ask them: 'Okay, you in fact want to take their side, help them come to power. Then what?'," Putin said.

Under the US-Russian deal, Assad must account for his chemical weapon stockpiles within a week and see them destroyed by mid-next year.

According to AFP, Putin said that Syria had developed chemical weapons "as an alternative to the nuclear weapons of Israel."

"The technical advantage of Israel -- we need to say this directly -- is such that it doesn't need nuclear weapons. Israel is already in a technical military sense several heads above the countries in the region," he added.

"Nuclear weapons just make it a target. They just create foreign policy problems."

Related Content

August 17, 2018
Yazidi leader killed in air strike by Turkey four years after genocide