Court overturns sex crime conviction, after sentence served

For the first time ever, the Supreme Court overturned a criminal conviction in a retrial of a Kfar Saba man.

November 26, 2010 02:21
2 minute read.
A gavel strikes at the issuing of justice

311_gavel. (photo credit: Ariel Jerozolimski)


Dear Reader,
As you can imagine, more people are reading The Jerusalem Post than ever before. Nevertheless, traditional business models are no longer sustainable and high-quality publications, like ours, are being forced to look for new ways to keep going. Unlike many other news organizations, we have not put up a paywall. We want to keep our journalism open and accessible and be able to keep providing you with news and analysis from the frontlines of Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

As one of our loyal readers, we ask you to be our partner.

For $5 a month you will receive access to the following:

  • A user experience almost completely free of ads
  • Access to our Premium Section
  • Content from the award-winning Jerusalem Report and our monthly magazine to learn Hebrew - Ivrit
  • A brand new ePaper featuring the daily newspaper as it appears in print in Israel

Help us grow and continue telling Israel’s story to the world.

Thank you,

Ronit Hasin-Hochman, CEO, Jerusalem Post Group
Yaakov Katz, Editor-in-Chief


In a landmark decision on Thursday, the Supreme Court for the first time overturned a criminal conviction in a retrial.

The case involved a 76-year-old-man who had been found guilty of committing sexual crimes and served out his time in jail.

Man detained for suspected kidnapping, sodomy of 8-year-old
Child abuse is underreported throughout country

In the last few years, the Supreme Court has changed its policy and been somewhat more liberal in granting requests for retrials. But this is the first time that a retrial has resulted in the overturning of the original verdict.

The case involves Arnoldo Lazarovsky, who was a janitor at the Kfar Saba Country Club between 1991 and 1994. According to a complaint lodged by a teenager who patronized country club, Lazarovsky sexually attacked the boy, who was 12 years old when the alleged crimes began.

The boy, who only complained several years later, as he was about to join the army, went into great detail about Lazarovsky’s alleged sexual advances that included oral and anal sex.

On July 27, 2000, the Tel Aviv District Court convicted Lazarovsky of committing an indecent act and an act of sodomy against a minor less than 14 years of age. He was sentenced to six years in jail, including two years suspended.

Lazarovsky appealed to the Supreme Court, which let the verdict stand.

Soon afterward, the Tel Aviv Magistrate’s Court convicted Gregory Schneider of committing similar acts against a 14-year-old boy. It turned out that Schneider worked as a janitor at the same country club as Lazarovsky and the person who lodged the complaint against him was the same one who had complained against Lazarovsky.

Unlike Lazarovsky, however, Schneider appealed the decision to the Tel Aviv District Court, which acquitted him. Two of the judges found that the youth’s testimony was unreliable.

In the wake of this decision, Lazarovsky requested a retrial. Justice Miriam Naor, who was put in charge of the case, granted the request on the grounds that the Lazarovsky and Schneider cases were almost identical. Therefore, Schneider’s acquittal justified a retrial for Lazarovsky.

Naor sent the case back to the district court, which once again convicted Lazarovsky in a unanimous decision.

Once again, he appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, which, on Thursday, overruled the lower court and acquitted Lazarovsky. He had long since completed his sentence.

In an interview with Yediot Aharonot’s Web site, Lazarovsky’s daughter Leora said, “When I told my parents that father had been acquitted, they did not believe me and couldn’t understand where this came from. We have gone through hell.”

She said her father had suffered a heart attack because of the affair and was a broken man. Now, “my parents are crying with joy. All the fighting we did was not to get compensation but so that father would feel he got what he deserved.”

Nevertheless, it was likely the family would now sue the state, she added.

Join Jerusalem Post Premium Plus now for just $5 and upgrade your experience with an ads-free website and exclusive content. Click here>>

Related Content

August 31, 2014
Rioting resumes throughout east Jerusalem Saturday night